Quantum Computing Navigating The Future Of Proquest

Bonisiwe Shabane

-Jan 2, 2026, 12:23 PM

quantum computing navigating the future of proquest

Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox By continuing, I agree to the Market Data Terms of Service and Privacy Statement Memon, Q.A.; Al Ahmad, M.; Pecht, M. Quantum Computing: Navigating the Future of Computation, Challenges, and Technological Breakthroughs. Quantum Rep. 2024, 6, 627-663.

https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum6040039 Memon QA, Al Ahmad M, Pecht M. Quantum Computing: Navigating the Future of Computation, Challenges, and Technological Breakthroughs. Quantum Reports. 2024; 6(4):627-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum6040039

Memon, Qurban A., Mahmoud Al Ahmad, and Michael Pecht. 2024. "Quantum Computing: Navigating the Future of Computation, Challenges, and Technological Breakthroughs" Quantum Reports 6, no. 4: 627-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum6040039 Memon, Q.

A., Al Ahmad, M., & Pecht, M. (2024). Quantum Computing: Navigating the Future of Computation, Challenges, and Technological Breakthroughs. Quantum Reports, 6(4), 627-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum6040039 Imagine a world where the very foundation of digital currency is stripped bare by the power of quantum computing.

The implications are both thrilling and terrifying, particularly for Bitcoin, which stands vulnerable at the intersection of innovation and existential crisis. As we delve deeper, a complex web of governance and property rights emerges—one that has the power to shift Bitcoin’s future into uncharted territory. The advancements in quantum computing are not just a distant threat; they are rapidly converging upon Bitcoin, compelling its community to confront a governance crisis unlike any seen before. Historically slow to adapt, Bitcoin’s protocol updates find themselves racing against the relentless pace of quantum innovation. This clash is revealing cracks in the cryptocurrency’s once-impenetrable security, necessitating a fundamental reassessment of how Bitcoin governs itself and evolves. The clock is ticking, and the risk of stagnation looms large.

At the heart of this dilemma is the dual-edged nature of quantum technology, which possesses the capacity to dismantle the cryptographic barriers that currently secure Bitcoin. The specter of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) threatens to unearth public keys, potentially exposing private keys and laying vast amounts of Bitcoin open to exploitation. This is not merely speculation; the threat is menacingly real, demanding urgent action from the Bitcoin community to shore up defenses and preemptively address vulnerabilities that could undermine the infrastructure of trust. The irony is palpable: while Bitcoin boasts an impressive treasure trove of assets, much of it exists in a state of vulnerability, particularly the coins that have remained dormant since the early days. These coins, often stored in reused or older Taproot addresses, lie in the path of the impending quantum onslaught. The discussion around potential protocol-level adaptations to safeguard these assets raises fundamental questions about the sanctity of property rights versus the collective need for security.

As Bitcoin grapples with these questions, its core values are called into question under the glare of imminent threat. Amidst the technological tempest, a vital course correction emerges: the urgent transition to post-quantum signature schemes. Both governmental bodies and industry leaders are making strides towards bolstering cryptographic resilience, and the call to action for Bitcoin participants is unmistakable. While efforts mount, Bitcoin’s sluggish governance structure presents a significant vulnerability, impeding its ability to adapt swiftly to destabilizing forces from the quantum realm. The looming threat of quantum computing necessitates a rapid transition to quantum-safe cryptographic systems, as today’s encrypted data becomes vulnerable to future decryption. Ailsa Robertson, Siân Brooke, and Sebastian De Haro, alongside Christian Schaffner, all from Universiteit van Amsterdam and QuSoft, investigate the complex landscape of this crucial transition.

Their research delivers a comprehensive, system-level mapping of the actors, influence pathways, and governance responsibilities shaping the move to quantum-safe cryptography, identifying critical gaps in ownership and coordination. This work, stemming from an expert workshop, moves beyond technical solutions to address the social and governance challenges inherent in securing digital infrastructure against the quantum threat, offering insights applicable to national contexts worldwide. This research comprehensively analyses the Dutch national innovation system for quantum-safe cryptography (NISQSCN), examining the roles, responsibilities, and interactions of various actors involved in the transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC). The core argument is that understanding both the formal and interpretative roles of these actors, how they actually behave, their motivations, and the dynamics of power, is crucial for a successful transition. This moves beyond simply defining who should do what, to understanding how things get done and why. The analysis is grounded in the framework of National Innovation Systems, which views innovation as a complex process involving multiple actors and relationships.

The research identifies twelve key actor groups, including Branch, Consulting and Advisory, End Users, Financiers, Manufacturers, Network Ops, Promoters, Regulators, Research and Education, Standards, and Supervisors. Each actor possesses both formal and interpretative roles; for example, Regulators set regulation and mandate interoperability, but also exert influence with standardization bodies. The study highlights that interpretative roles, the actual behaviours and motivations, often outweigh formal roles in determining success. A comprehensive systems analysis, focus on interpretative roles, practical implications for policymakers, and clear organisation are key strengths of the paper. The research acknowledges potential limitations, including a lack of detailed methodology and limited empirical evidence, and notes that the analysis is specific to the Netherlands. However, it provides a valuable contribution to the literature on innovation systems and cybersecurity, offering nuanced insights into the challenges and opportunities involved in the transition to post-quantum cryptography.

This study pioneers a novel approach to understanding the transition to quantum-safe cryptography, moving beyond technical assessments to examine the socio-institutional landscape. Researchers conducted an expert workshop in Amsterdam, leveraging insights from twelve key actor groups to develop a socially informed vision for a quantum-safe future. The methodology centres on a qualitative, iterative focus group design, enabling researchers to elicit stakeholder insights and refine analytical frameworks. This facilitated a deep understanding of policy coordination failures constraining the Dutch innovation system, revealing several responsibilities with unclear ownership. The study integrates technically informed perspectives into its social scientific analysis, enabling effective communication and engagement with stakeholders. This involved detailed explanations of cryptographic systems, quantum properties, and the potential impact of cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs).

Researchers defined Quantum-Safe Cryptography (QSC) as encompassing all cryptographic methods expected to withstand both classical and quantum attacks, with Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) as a major subset. This comprehensive approach frames the cryptographic transition as an innovation-system challenge, revealing how agency, expertise, and institutional coordination collectively shape societal readiness for the quantum threat. Quantum computing has moved from research labs and theoretical papers into the strategic radar of major financial institutions and regulators. While still developing, the technology is already shaping how banks and central banks approach risk modeling, derivatives pricing, cybersecurity, and long-term infrastructure planning. In December 2025, HSBC reported measurable improvements in bond trading predictions using quantum-enhanced algorithms, while BBVA concluded distributed quantum simulations to model complex financial scenarios such as portfolio risk and fraud detection. Surveys indicate that a substantial majority of large banks worldwide now maintain active quantum pilots or research programs.

These developments illustrate that quantum computing in finance is no longer a distant curiosity but a race that institutions are running now, even while the technology remains far from fully mature. This momentum extends beyond isolated pilots. Regulators, central banks, and standard-setting bodies are actively engaged, hosting forums and publishing guidance on quantum readiness. National strategies, such as Spain’s €800 million initiative in quantum technologies, and global events like the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology underline that quantum is shaping policy, research investment, and financial practice... The sector’s engagement is therefore both tactical and strategic: banks are experimenting with real applications while policymakers monitor systemic implications, and financial institutions are aligning talent acquisition, hybrid computational workflows, and model validation efforts... This confluence of institutional attention highlights that the story of quantum computing in finance is broader than it may appear from any single pilot.

Quantum computing entered finance initially as a theoretical curiosity. Early research focused on algorithm design and cryptography experiments, often confined to university labs or cloud-based simulators. The limitations of hardware, coherence times, and qubit counts kept the technology largely academic, and early industry applications were exploratory, testing the principles of quantum algorithms in controlled settings. Banks observing these developments treated them cautiously, tracking academic output while considering long-term strategic implications. In recent years, however, institutions have begun taking explicit steps toward operational integration. HSBC’s trial of quantum-enabled algorithmic trading with IBM demonstrated that hybrid quantum-classical systems could deliver measurable improvements in predicting European corporate bond trades, translating abstract computational potential into tangible business outcomes.

The trial combined quantum processors for high-dimensional scenario analysis with classical systems for workflow orchestration, allowing the bank to experiment without disrupting core operations. BBVA, in parallel, piloted distributed quantum simulations across classical cloud infrastructure to explore complex computation tasks relevant to financial modeling. Presented at industry gatherings such as Banks in Quantum Days, these experiments illustrate that early adoption is strategically targeted toward areas where quantum computing strengths, combinatorial computation and optimization, can already deliver insights, even... This shift from theory to institutionally owned pilot programs demonstrates that quantum computing is no longer a curiosity but a developing component of strategic planning and risk management in finance. The focus is as much on governance, workforce preparation, and regulatory alignment as it is on raw computational improvement. Quantum computing stands at the precipice of technological revolution, promising unprecedented computational capabilities to tackle some of humanity’s most complex problems.

The field is highly collaborative and recent developments such as superconducting qubits with increased scaling, reduced error rates, and improved cryogenic infrastructure, trapped-ion qubits with high-fidelity gates and reduced control hardware complexity, and photonic... However, the path to realizing this promise is fraught with significant obstacles across several key platforms, including sensitivity to errors, decoherence, scalability, and the need for new materials and technologies. Through an exploration of various quantum systems, this paper highlights both the potential and the challenges of quantum computing and discusses the essential role of middleware, quantum hardware development, and the strategic investments required... With a focus on overcoming technical hurdles through innovation and interdisciplinary research, this review underscores the transformative impact quantum computing could have across diverse sectors.

Quantum Computing Navigating The Future Of Proquest

People Also Search

Daily Stocks & Crypto Headlines, Free To Your Inbox By

Https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum6040039 Memon QA, Al Ahmad M, Pecht M. Quantum Computing:

Memon, Qurban A., Mahmoud Al Ahmad, And Michael Pecht. 2024.

A., Al Ahmad, M., & Pecht, M. (2024). Quantum Computing:

The Implications Are Both Thrilling And Terrifying, Particularly For Bitcoin,