Why Ai Can T Write Like A Human Medium

Bonisiwe Shabane

-Nov 18, 2025, 2:59 PM

At a time when skepticism runs high toward experts—from doctors to journalists—people are quick to accept claims from the AI industry. AI is hailed as a genius innovation that will change everything. Yet, there’s an uneasy truth beneath the hype: AI promises to replace many workers, including editors and writers. To test how close this future might be, I asked ChatGPT to write a grammar book mimicking my style. The response was quick and confident, claiming it could channel my voice: fun, fierce, and friendly. But the results?

A mix of smooth phrasing and glaring mistakes. The AI started strong, opening with a sentence meant to be catchy: “Let’s face it: grammar has trust issues.” But that phrase doesn’t quite work. Saying grammar “has trust issues” implies grammar itself can’t trust others, which isn’t the intended meaning. The AI confused idiomatic expressions and misused phrases like “spoiler alert” and “we’ll admit,” creating awkward, illogical sentences. Another problem was inconsistent voice. The AI shifted between plural and singular first-person pronouns (“we” and “I”) in a way that no single-author book would.

It also tossed in strange metaphors, like calling verbs “the Beyonce of grammar,” without explanation. Some facts were flat-out wrong, such as labeling the verb “are” in “We are never getting back together” as a linking verb, when it’s actually an auxiliary verb. Midway through writing about AI’s grammar book attempt, I was assigned to revise a short video script written by AI. The task was to make it sound more natural. The script wasn’t just awkward—it was illogical and missed the point. It promoted an AI program that supposedly turns P.R.

pitches into newspaper articles, ignoring journalism’s role in filtering and reporting facts. After rewriting it with clarity and focus, the editor’s feedback was clear: “Your version is SO GOOD.” I don’t read books and blog posts to connect with algorithms. I read to connect with people. In her recent book, The Curious Reader’s Field Guide to Nonfiction, writing expert Anne Janzer points out that very often readers feel a personal connection with their favorite authors. They develop a relationship with those authors as fellow humans.

She bemoans the fact that Artificial Intelligence-generated books destroy that relationship. As she says, “We read to connect with people, not algorithms.” Unfortunately, some writers are giving AI some idea prompts and then letting AI generate text for their articles and books. Obviously, it’s faster and easier than the hard work of writing. But what is generated is not their writing, and it does not reflect their thinking after wrestling with ideas during the writing process. "Contradiction is the root of all movement and vitality; it is only insofar as something has a contradiction within it that it moves, has an urge and activity." — Hegel, Science of Logic

As I sat down to write about technology and management using artificial intelligence, I couldn't shake off a lingering thought: despite AI's astonishing capabilities, there's an unshakable feeling that something is missing. Each interaction with AI brings forth questions about this remarkable technology's true understanding—or lack thereof—of human nuance. Is AI genuinely enhancing our writing, or is it merely shifting our approach to creativity and expression? Every time I prompt an AI to generate content, the result feels flat and cold. Even when I request a more vibrant style, the AI adapts mechanically, lacking the spark that characterizes human writing. Over time, I've become adept at distinguishing between AI-generated text and human-authored content.

Despite efforts to train the AI to produce more human-like prose, it never fully achieves the transformation. Why can't AI simulate human writing? The answer seems to lie in the absence of subjectivity. Jacques Derrida noted that writing is a play of difference in meaning, always subject to interpretation based on historical and societal contexts. Devoid of personal experience and emotion, AI's writing lacks this dynamic quality. It doesn't anticipate human reactions beyond statistical predictions, resulting in content that feels inert and disconnected.

Proponents of AI often assert that it's here to assist, not replace us. They encourage embracing AI to accomplish tasks more efficiently. However, this assistance comes with unintended consequences. Writing this article without AI forced me to rely on my beliefs, draw from personal experiences, and engage deeply with new concepts. The process was immersive and intellectually stimulating. AI was supposed to revolutionize writing—automating content, eliminating the need for human creativity, and making high-quality text accessible to everyone.

But instead, it has exposed its own limitations. Yes, AI can generate passable essays, articles, and reports—but only at a surface level. It can mimic human language, but it doesn’t understand what it’s saying. It can summarize ideas, but it can’t create new ones. The result? A flood of AI-generated writing that all sounds the same—generic, predictable, and forgettable.

Instead of replacing human writers, AI is making human creativity more valuable than ever. In academia, business, and publishing, the demand for original thought, compelling arguments, and strategic storytelling is rising. And those who rely on AI to do their thinking for them? They’re getting left behind. 📌 AI isn’t the future of writing—it’s a tool. And like any tool, its value depends entirely on the hands that use it.

In an age where AI seems to be doing it all, from writing never-ending sales cadence emails, generating mediocre marketing blogs, or drafting emoji-laden social posts, there’s a new problem we often overlook: the... AI-generated text, while polished, tends to fall back on the same overused words and phrases, often making content sound generic and uninspired. Have you ever noticed how tools like ChatGPT seem to love words like “delve”? I abhor it and can’t count the times I’ve seen “delve” pop up in AI-assisted phrasing — it’s supposed to add depth, but usually just feels empty. Leaders in business and tech need to understand these junk word language patterns to effectively communicate and avoid AI monotony. What if the messaging in your business content started sounding flat, even hollow?

Or, on a more personal level, what if a loved one’s college essay or term paper was flagged for being unoriginal simply because an AI reviewer found it too predictable? Large Language Models (LLMs), the driving force behind today’s AI text tools, are trained on enormous corpora — hundreds of thousands of documents that shape how they “talk.” And these datasets aren’t exactly models... Updated on: June 03, 2025 | Author: Anup Chaudhari Our years of research and commitment to AI are finally beginning to show the fruits of our labor. We are now operating in a space that’s becoming more accepting of AI’s creative voice. However, there is always a question that lingers: Can AI write like a human someday?

At present, AI’s progress appears impressive, but it comes with its own set of challenges. Be it the lack of a personalized approach or a sense of empathy, a Human-sounding AI tool is yet to make its mark.Still, with the growing demand for AI in marketing, customer support, entertainment,... This blog is a closer look at our progress with conversational tone in AI writing to date, and the possibility of its extent. Have you ever wondered how to call out AI-generated writing at an instant? If you take a closer look, you will realize that it is more than just the rigid structure. AI-generated content lacks layers of emotions, lived experiences, and a firsthand understanding of the pain points.

The human touch in writing is always about having a personal voice or tone that assures it is coming from a place of experience. But with AI, it is collated facts and figures backed by a straightforward narrative. You will feel like reading a series of facts that offer no space for any emotion, whatsoever. For starters, when it comes to writing titles for my opinion pieces, I'm already 1-0 against the machine. No ChatGPT or Gemini is coming up with this, no matter how many times you throw keep it informal and slick in your prompt. You know how I know AI cannot beat a real writer?

Or a poet who never prostituted to slam poetry theatrics or Instagrammic one-liners? Or someone who understands the difference between a Nolan movie and a Villeneuve movie and another who finds both of those inferior to Hirokazu's Monster and Kiyoshi's Cure? Because AI is incapable of doubt and bursts of exclamations and forbidden comparisons and poetic licenses and disdain for LinkedIn-ization of English grammar. AI cannot possibly write this bar from the song 6 Foot 7 Foot, shout-out to Weezy, "real Gs move in silence like lasagna." And you know why this opinion piece is written by a... Because AI could never draft a sentence with this many 'ands' and zero commas. Because if this were written by AI, you wouldn't be reading this in your head in your voice.

Because, unlike me, AI doesn't have ADHD. That's what makes it human, and that's why AI will always be too polished, too pretentious, too religious, too incarcerated, too dolled up, and too much like Ted from HIMYM, a whiny baby who... Ted, you're not going to want to hear this, but Barney was never insufferable in the show. You know why AI cannot write like me? Because it couldn't, in its unlimited and unchecked plagiarism of all human content in history, understand how the comparison with Ted applies. And it cannot accept that it doesn't have friends, so it doesn't know how friends talk.

If I ask it to be informal, it would be just as formal, but with a bad hook and a not-so-clever punchline. Like trying to make a dad joke, but no one smiles even awkwardly because your personality is just not cool. It is just not. But what else? Is it just that AI wouldn't write grammatically incorrect text? Or that it can't be funny?

Why Ai Can T Write Like A Human Medium

People Also Search

At A Time When Skepticism Runs High Toward Experts—from Doctors

A Mix Of Smooth Phrasing And Glaring Mistakes. The AI

It Also Tossed In Strange Metaphors, Like Calling Verbs “the

Pitches Into Newspaper Articles, Ignoring Journalism’s Role In Filtering And

She Bemoans The Fact That Artificial Intelligence-generated Books Destroy That