Tqf Rubric University Of Colorado Boulder

The Teaching Quality Framework Rubric is a tool for considering different dimensions of quality teaching and what various levels of proficiency in each of those dimensions may look like. The dimensions of quality teaching presented here (Goals, Content, & Alignment; Preparation for Teaching; Methods & Teaching Practices; Presentation & Student Interaction; Sutdent Outcomes; Mentorship & Advising; and Reflection, Development, & Teaching Service/Scholarship) are... Within these dimensions are various criteria that can be used to gauge and support growth in teaching proficiency. The TQF rubric is meant to provide departments with a scholarly approach that takes in consideration the development of teaching quality of faculty members over time, and therefore can be used for formal processes... Please note we will periodically replace the above files as revisions are made. If you share the TQF Rubric(s), we ask that you share the link to this webpage rather than to the file itself.

Questions or feedback on this rubric can be directed to Noah Finkelstein at finkelsn@colorado.edu or Cynthia Hampton at cynthia.hampton@colorado.edu. Teaching Quality Framework Initiative (1-page summary) Evaluating Teaching in a Scholarly Manner: A Model and Call for an Evidence-Based, Departmentally-Defined Approach to Enhance Teaching Evaluation for CU Boulder - Initial White Paper; 2017, - Revised for CU's Academic Futures (2018) with a follow-up paper D. Reinholz, N. Finkelstein, J.

Corbo, and D. Bernstein, "Evaluating scholarly teaching: A model and call for an evidence-based approach," in Learning Analytics in Higher Education: Current Innovations, Future Potential, and Practical Applications, Routledge press. (2019) Teaching Quality Framework Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ; January 2019) Resources for Teaching Transformation - Processes for change (departmental & institutional) The Teaching Quality Framework (TQF) initiative facilitates departmental and campus-wide efforts to provide a richer evaluation of teaching to enhance the value of high-quality teaching and reward scholarly approaches to improving student learning.

The TQF team will work with interested departments to develop and adopt a new framework for supporting and assessing teaching. The framework draws from multiple sources of evidence of high-quality teaching, including the instructor’s materials, peer feedback, and student voices. The teaching quality framework is grounded in the scholarship of higher education, including the work of Bernstein and colleagues (2002, 2010) and Glassick and colleagues (1997). It defines teaching as a scholarly activity like research. In this way, teaching can be conceptualized in terms of seven core components of scholarly teaching — goals, content, and alignment; preparation for teaching; methods and teaching practices; presentation and student interaction; student outcomes;... To garner support and recognition of scholarship in these areas, one can use three “voices”: from the faculty member being assessed, their students, and their peers.

The framework supports improved teaching by providing standards for development to help faculty improve their teaching practices. The framework categories are held constant across all departments; however, the interpretation of these categories and their relative weights are defined at a department-by-department level, providing the university with a common approach to assessment... For more details on the TQF initiative, please see our Resources page which includes a single-page summary and a longer white paper describing the initiative. The TQF initiative is part of the consortium of leading-edge institutions that make up the TEval: Transforming Higher Education - Multidimensional Evaluation of Teachingproject to promote and study the use of scholarly approaches to... We are funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF, #1725959) and the University of Colorado Boulder (College of Arts and Sciences, College of Engineering and Applied Science, and Leeds School of Business). TQF also benefits from strong ties with many local and national affiliates, including the Bay View Alliance (BVA) and the Association of American Universities (AAU).

A list of partners, affiliates, and collaborators can be found below. Many units on the CU Boulder campus have been working in partnership with the Teaching Quality Framework (TQF) Inititiative to better align their teaching evaluation practices with known scholarship on teaching evaluation by: a)... These are designed to fulfill university requireiments - see "CU Policies Related to Measuring Teaching Effectiveness" for an annotated list of CU policies that support academic units defining their own measures of teaching quality... The following tools are designed to align with an overarching rubric (2 page version) that categorizes seven dimensions of teaching, and draws from three voices (peer review, self-evaluation, and student evaluation). Working with the TQF-team, departmental teams utilizing the Departmental Action Team (DAT) model (Corbo et al. 2016) have developed tools and processes for measuring teaching quality for the purpose of merit and / or reappointment, tenure, and promotion.

Below we provide links to generic templates and department-specific examples of these materials, which currently fit into four broad categories: Peer Observation, Self-Evaluation, Student Evaluation, and Applying the Overarching Rubric to an Evaluation Form. Please note that many of the examples are still in development (notations below: “in use” = currently being used by the department in their evaluation process(es); “in review” = being reviewed and/or piloted by... As additional “in use” versions become available we will update this list. Unstructured peer classroom observations, i.e., those that are not based on a set of core criteria, can result in inconsistency and do not always address teaching practices that are valued by a department (AAAS... For this reason, scholarly literature on teaching evaluation recommends that academic units articulate the best teaching practices for their field and define core criteria to use in the observation process (AAAS 2012). Feedback on teaching can be more effective in promoting growth and improvement when it focuses on specific issues, contains concrete information, and is based on specific data (rather than general impressions) (Brinko 1993).

Toward these ends, departments working with the TQF have developed standardized peer observation protocols, peer evaluation plans, and associated materials. (return to top) These peer observation protocols are intended to provide structure and consistency to peer classroom observations. The templates and examples below draw heavily from the UTeach Observation Protocol (UTOP: https://utop.uteach.utexas.edu/) and the Oregon Teacher Observation Protocol (OTOP): Wainwright et al. 2003). Many departments have chosen to explicitly include active learning as a category for peer observation; in departments where faculty may be less familiar with active learning, a more detailed addendum may be added to...

The Teaching Quality Framework Initiative (TQF) has developed a toolkit of resources for departmental change efforts related to transforming teaching evaluation. This Toolkit is meant to provide institutions and departments with tools and guidance to help them engage in a process of teaching evaluation transformation without the direct support of a group like the TQF. The Toolkit is designed to have two major sections: one aimed at departments and faculty members engaging in the transformation process, and one aimed at institutions looking to support this type of work. At the moment we are focusing on the departmental / faculty level resources of the toolkit. While this section, along with an overview section that provides an introduction and background on TQF and teaching evaluation, are still a work in progress, we are making it available in its beta form. Transforming Teaching Evaluation: A Toolkit of Resources for Departmental Level Change (aka TQF Departmental Toolkit) [beta draft 12-2021] (see below for a description).

Transforming Teaching Evaluation: A Toolkit of Resources for Institutional Transformation (forthcoming) Please note we will periodically replace this file as revisions are made. If you share the Toolkit, we ask that you share the link to this webpage rather than to the file itself. Questions or feedback on this toolkit can be directed to Sarah Andrews at sarah.andrews-1@colorado.edu. Please note: this document is currently in development.It is intended to provide guidance and resources to those interested in improving teaching assessment in higher education. The recommendations and philosophy of assessment described below will continue to evolve with additional resource-gathering and research.

If you have additional questions or would like to share relevant literature, please do so on our FAQ Feedback page. This document's development has been supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (DUE-1725959), the American Association of Universities, and the University of Colorado Boulder. Any opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of those organizations. A pdf version is available here (last updated May 31, 2022). At many research universities, current evaluation systems for tenure and promotion poorly assess and/or undervalue the importance of teaching effectiveness, relying instead on research success (Bradforth et al., 2015). Current practices at most research universities have led to limited value being placed on effective teaching at best, and — at worst — actually reward poor teaching (Braga, Paccagnella, & Pellizzari; 2014).

Normative practices are neither as effective as we want nor do they give pathways for improvement; that is, they often lack systematic processes for formative development es and can provide inaccurate summative information. For more information on this, see the section on SETs. A vast array of resources are available through CU’s Teaching Quality Framework and Quality Teaching Initiatives. Building on and collaborating with the KU efforts, CU has adapted the KU materials and its predecessors to create a local 7-dimensional rubric, this is part of the broader framework that includes both the... A great place to start is CU Boulder's 1 page summary of their Teaching Quality Framework For a bit more info, CU's 2-pager on TQF includes a brief introduction to its multi-dimensional rubric: Teaching Quality Framework Rubric - Oct 2020

Still want more, you got it: TQF example rubric-based approach to evaluating teaching Peer Reviewed ✔ | Editorial Board Score: 17/18 Central, campus-wide, and departmental teams Contact: Noah Finkelstein (noah.finkelstein@colorado.edu) The Teaching Quality Framework (TQF) initiative facilitates departmental and campus-wide efforts to provide a richer evaluation of teaching. Through enhanced evaluations, we promote and value high quality teaching, align resources, and reward scholarly approaches to improving student learning.

Drawing on decades of scholarship and national models, this initiative creates a common campus-wide approach that is disciplinarily defined and enacted, and centrally supported. Review the associated resources and the Toolkit. Also check out the following publications: Please note: this document is currently in development.It is intended to provide guidance and resources to those interested in improving teaching assessment in higher education. The recommendations and philosophy of assessment described below will continue to evolve with additional resource-gathering and research. If you have additional questions or would like to share relevant literature, please do so on our FAQ Feedback page.

This document's development has been supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (DUE-1725959), the American Association of Universities, and the University of Colorado Boulder. Any opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of those organizations. A pdf version is available here��(last updated May 31, 2022). At many research universities, current evaluation systems for tenure and promotion poorly assess and/or undervalue the importance of ��teaching effectiveness, relying instead on research success (). Current practices at most research universities have led to limited value being placed on effective teaching at best, and — at worst — actually reward poor teaching (). Normative practices are neither as effective as we want nor do they give pathways for improvement; that is, they often lack systematic processes for formative development es and can provide inaccurate summative information.

For more information on this, see the section on SETs. Rubrics are an important assessment tool used to evaluate work/performance against a set standard. They are important to ensure grading is done systematically, objectively and in a transparent manner. The type of rubrics needed however to grade can vastly differ based on the type of grading approach(traditional grading vs alternative grading approach) and the purpose and type of assessment. In this workshop we will go over different types of rubrics, steps to creating a rubric and best practices in implementing rubrics. Through hands-on activities, participants will have a better understanding of how to pick an appropriate rubric for a given assessment and work to design a rubric for an assessment of their own choice.

This event is hybrid. Join us on Zoom or in-person Thursday, April 11 from 9:00 a.m.-10:15 a.m. MT, RSVP here ➡️ Select "I'm Interested" to receive event updates! ➡️ The Campus Events Calendar is provided by Strategic Relations and Communications

People Also Search

• TQF Rubric - University of Colorado Boulder
• Teaching Quality Framework Initiative - University of Colorado Boulder
• About TQF - University of Colorado Boulder
• Tools for Teaching Evaluation: TQF Templates and Department Examples
• TQF Toolkit - University of Colorado Boulder
• TQF Frequently Asked Questions. - University of Colorado Boulder
• TEval: CU Framework
• Teaching Quality Framework Initiative - Evaluation Initiatives Collection
• TQF Frequently Asked Questions. | Teaching Quality Framework Initiative ...
• Rubrics: What, why and how? - University of Colorado Boulder