Pdf Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored Apa Psycnet
Recent academic debate has seen the emergence of the claim that misinformation is not a significant societal problem. We argue that the arguments used to support this minimizing position are flawed, particularly if interpreted (e.g., by policymakers or the public) as suggesting that misinformation can be safely ignored. Here, we rebut the two main claims, namely that misinformation is not of substantive concern (a) due to its low incidence and (b) because it has no causal influence on notable political or behavioral... Through a critical review of the current literature, we demonstrate that (a) the prevalence of misinformation is nonnegligible if reasonably inclusive definitions are applied and that (b) misinformation has causal impacts on important beliefs... Both scholars and policymakers should therefore continue to take misinformation seriously. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Ullrich K H Ecker*, Li Qian Tay, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander Van Der Linden, John Cook, Naomi Oreskes, Stephan Lewandowsky Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review T1 - Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s) Ullrich K.
H. Ecker, Li Qian Tay, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden, John Cook, Naomi Oreskes, Stephan Lewandowsky Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review T1 - Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored N2 - Recent academic debate has seen the emergence of the claim that misinformation is not a significant societal problem.
We argue that the arguments used to support this minimizing position are flawed, particularly if interpreted (e.g., by policymakers or the public) as suggesting that misinformation can be safely ignored. Here, we rebut the two main claims, namely that misinformation is not of substantive concern (a) due to its low incidence and (b) because it has no causal influence on notable political or behavioral... Through a critical review of the current literature, we demonstrate that (a) the prevalence of misinformation is nonnegligible if reasonably inclusive definitions are applied and that (b) misinformation has causal impacts on important beliefs... Both scholars and policymakers should therefore continue to take misinformation seriously. Public Significance Statement This article refutes claims that misinformation is an insignificant issue. Through a critical literature review, we demonstrate that misinformation represents a nontrivial part of the information environment and can causally and adversely influence people's beliefs, decisions, and behaviors.
We clarify through our discussion why misinformation continues to be a significant problem that should not be ignored by communicators and policymakers.
People Also Search
- PDF Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored - APA PsycNet
- Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored (APA) Long, but you can use it ...
- Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored | Request PDF
- PDF Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored - emc-lab.org
- Why misinformation must not be ignored - PubMed
- Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored - University of Bristol
- Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored - APA PsycNet
- Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored - the UWA Profiles and Research ...
- PDF American Psychologist - APA PsycNet
- PDF Using Psychological Science to Understand and Fight Health Misinformation
Recent Academic Debate Has Seen The Emergence Of The Claim
Recent academic debate has seen the emergence of the claim that misinformation is not a significant societal problem. We argue that the arguments used to support this minimizing position are flawed, particularly if interpreted (e.g., by policymakers or the public) as suggesting that misinformation can be safely ignored. Here, we rebut the two main claims, namely that misinformation is not of subst...
Ullrich K H Ecker*, Li Qian Tay, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander
Ullrich K H Ecker*, Li Qian Tay, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander Van Der Linden, John Cook, Naomi Oreskes, Stephan Lewandowsky Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review T1 - Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s) Ullrich K.
H. Ecker, Li Qian Tay, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander Van Der
H. Ecker, Li Qian Tay, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden, John Cook, Naomi Oreskes, Stephan Lewandowsky Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review T1 - Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored N2 - Recent academic debate has seen the emergence of the claim that misinformation is not a significant societal prob...
We Argue That The Arguments Used To Support This Minimizing
We argue that the arguments used to support this minimizing position are flawed, particularly if interpreted (e.g., by policymakers or the public) as suggesting that misinformation can be safely ignored. Here, we rebut the two main claims, namely that misinformation is not of substantive concern (a) due to its low incidence and (b) because it has no causal influence on notable political or behavio...
We Clarify Through Our Discussion Why Misinformation Continues To Be
We clarify through our discussion why misinformation continues to be a significant problem that should not be ignored by communicators and policymakers.