Pdf The Athletic Intelligence Quotient And Performance In The National

Bonisiwe Shabane

-Oct 31, 2025, 6:05 PM

pdf the athletic intelligence quotient and performance in the national

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. 2020, Sports and Exercise Medicine – Open Journal Introduction In the realm of competitive athletics, numerous variables have been examined for predictive utility with respect to player selection/development and outcomes on the field. Notwithstanding important advances, the current predictors only account for a modest amount of variance in outcomes of relevance in the National Football League (NFL). Objective The primary objective of this study was to investigate the predictive validity of a new measure of athletic intelligence, the Athletic Intelligence Quotient (AIQ), which is based on the empirically supported Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC)...

The predictive validity of the AIQ was determined in relation to performance metrics from 146 NFL players across several seasons. Results Hierarchical regression analyses indicate that specific AIQ factors accounted for a statistically significant increase in the explanation of variance beyond the current level of evaluation for several performance metrics (e.g., career ap... Thirty years after graduating from Stanford University, I look back on my experience as a star college basketball player and marvel: Why and how did I damage both knees so severely that it is... Is lifelong disability an inevitable consequence of college sports? Whose responsibility is it to ensure that college athletes not only learn how to stretch and push their bodies, but also how to care for them? In this article, I describe what I call physical intelligence (the ability to listen to the body's subtle signals and respond wisely to them).

I call on college coaches and athletic trainers to advocate openly for physical intelligence education and the long-term health of their athletes, even if such advocacy results in fewer team victories. I assert that the ultimate responsibility for the health of college athletes rests in the hands of the athletes themselves, who can develop physical intelligence the way they develop sports skills-that is, through practice. Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. 2020, Sports and Exercise Medicine – Open Journal Introduction In the realm of competitive athletics, numerous variables have been examined for predictive utility with respect to player selection/development and outcomes on the field.

Notwithstanding important advances, the current predictors only account for a modest amount of variance in outcomes of relevance in the National Football League (NFL). Objective The primary objective of this study was to investigate the predictive validity of a new measure of athletic intelligence, the Athletic Intelligence Quotient (AIQ), which is based on the empirically supported Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC)... The predictive validity of the AIQ was determined in relation to performance metrics from 146 NFL players across several seasons. Results Hierarchical regression analyses indicate that specific AIQ factors accounted for a statistically significant increase in the explanation of variance beyond the current level of evaluation for several performance metrics (e.g., career ap... Thirty years after graduating from Stanford University, I look back on my experience as a star college basketball player and marvel: Why and how did I damage both knees so severely that it is... Is lifelong disability an inevitable consequence of college sports?

Whose responsibility is it to ensure that college athletes not only learn how to stretch and push their bodies, but also how to care for them? In this article, I describe what I call physical intelligence (the ability to listen to the body's subtle signals and respond wisely to them). I call on college coaches and athletic trainers to advocate openly for physical intelligence education and the long-term health of their athletes, even if such advocacy results in fewer team victories. I assert that the ultimate responsibility for the health of college athletes rests in the hands of the athletes themselves, who can develop physical intelligence the way they develop sports skills-that is, through practice. Edited by: Nuno Leite, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal Reviewed by: Hongyou Liu, South China Normal University, China; Benoît Louvet, Université de Rouen, France

*Correspondence: James Kenneth Bowman, bowman@athleticintel.com This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Received 2020 Nov 16; Accepted 2021 May 31; Collection date 2021. Your research is the real superpower - learn how we maximise its impact through our leading community journals In the NFL, games are often decided in inches and seconds. We analyze forty times, measure vertical jumps, and pour over film — all in search of the small edge that separates a starter from a backup, or a Pro Bowler from an average role...

But what if some of the most important differences can’t be seen on film or measured in a weight room? What if the real separator is how an athlete thinks? That’s the question behind a published study of the Athletic Intelligence Quotient (AIQ) and its relationship to NFL performance. And the findings are clear: cognitive intelligence provides predictive power that traditional scouting can’t capture alone. Researchers tested 146 NFL prospects who completed the AIQ at the 2015 and 2016 combines. The AIQ, built on the well-established Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence, measures four core areas of cognitive functioning:

Visual Spatial Processing – how well a player interprets space, depth, and positioning Prior to selecting an NBA player, teams consider multiple factors, including game film and tests of agility, strength, speed, anthropometry, and personality. In recent years, as the other major professional sports have begun to place greater emphasis on the measurement of cognitive abilities, so too have representatives in the NBA. In this study, the predictive validity of an empirically-supported measure of cognitive ability (AIQ) was examined vis-à-vis performance outcomes in the NBA. Specifically, AIQ scores were obtained from 356 NBA prospects prior to their draft between 2014 and 2019. The players’ professional status and subsequent performance were assessed through composite and isolated NBA statistics.

ANOVAs demonstrated that there were significant differences between NBA and non-NBA players, and subsequent independent samples t-tests revealed that NBA players had significantly higher AIQ scores than non-NBA players for 3 out of 4... Additionally, using hierarchical multiple regression analyses, it was demonstrated that the AIQ predicted some modest statistically significant relationships with multiple NBA stats (e.g., Player Efficiency Rating, Effective Field Goal Percentage), after controlling for the... While the effect sizes for these differences and relationships were somewhat small, such findings are consistent with sport analytics and the restricted range when evaluating professional athletes. Given the expanding role of analytics and cognitive assessment in the NBA, the potential importance of the AIQ is considered in the draft process. Hogan, S. R., Taylor, D., Boone, R.

T., & Bowman, J. K. (2023). The Athletic Intelligence Quotient and performance in the National Basketball Association. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197190

Pdf The Athletic Intelligence Quotient And Performance In The National

People Also Search

Academia.edu No Longer Supports Internet Explorer. To Browse Academia.edu And

The Predictive Validity Of The AIQ Was Determined In Relation

I Call On College Coaches And Athletic Trainers To Advocate

Notwithstanding Important Advances, The Current Predictors Only Account For A

Whose Responsibility Is It To Ensure That College Athletes Not