Negative Effects Of Ai Art Understanding The Impact On Creativity And

Bonisiwe Shabane

-Nov 18, 2025, 8:05 PM

negative effects of ai art understanding the impact on creativity and

The rise of AI art has changed how we see creativity. Many people enjoy looking at images created by artificial intelligence. Yet, there are serious concerns about what this means for artists and the art world. The negative effects of AI art include lower value for traditional skills and loss of job opportunities for human artists. I have been observing the growth of AI in art and have dabbled in it as well to see how good (or bad) it can be. As AI continues to grow, it is clear to see that it can create art that looks polished and professional.

This instant ability has led to a rush of people using these tools without understanding the impact on real artists. Some artists feel threatened, seeing their hard work overlooked in favor of quick and easy AI creations. By nature, I am a left-brain thinker. A left-brain thinker likes logic, sequencing, linear thinking, math, facts, and thinking in words. A right-brain thinker has imagination, holistic thinking, and intuition and loves the arts, rhythm, nonverbal cues, feeling, visualizations, and daydreaming. While I am a left-brain thinker, I admire many of the traits of right-brain thinkers, especially their creativity.

Something interesting has happened to me since generative AI emerged. Thanks to various AI tools that transform verbal prompts into highly creative visuals, I’ve discovered a new level of creativity in myself. Suddenly, I’ve become more imaginative and increasingly skilled at using AI as a tool for creative expression. But as I might revel in the fact that I can be left-brain with an AI-driven right-brain, I see some serious pitfalls in relying on AI for my creativity instead of learning to draw... As someone who has spent decades forecasting the impact of technology on society, I have witnessed firsthand how each new wave of innovation brings both promise and peril. Today, we stand at the threshold of a new era defined by artificial intelligence-particularly generative AI - and its profound effects on creativity.

While AI offers unprecedented tools for ideation and productivity, there is a growing concern that its widespread adoption may inadvertently erode the foundation of human creativity that has driven progress for centuries. AI’s ability to generate ideas, images, music, and text at lightning speed is revolutionary. For creative professionals, AI can serve as a powerful accelerator, generating hundreds of design concepts or musical ideas in the time it would take a human to create just a few. This productivity boost is undeniably attractive in industries where deadlines are tight and competition is fierce. AI can analyze vast datasets, identify trends, and suggest novel combinations that might escape the human mind. With the rise of new tech and artificial intelligence like ChatGBT, Muse Net, or DALL-E, both the arts and education will undoubtedly be impacted in some sort of way.

In light of this idea, I followed up about the ideas of the evolving digital world with Mark McCafferty, the Chair of the Department of Music, and Swati Chopra, an Assistant Professor in the... Intriguingly, they both had several contrasting opinions regarding their fields. In the world of design, Chopra believed AI would, more so than positively, have a negative impact on the way we go about creating and experiencing art. “We could be generating art, but what it is doing is copying existing arts, and making a similar but different version. It’s more plagiarism than art,” she says. In other words, while AI can produce never-before-seen art, it is always going to be a derivative of another piece.

Would Chopra consider AI creations to be art at all? “I would call them art like, not art. I think it would require human thought, where there are real humans behind it. Although humans have coded it, no, AI is thinking on a different tangent.” Received 2023 May 26; Accepted 2023 Oct 17; Collection date 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit...

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from... To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The contemporary art world is conservatively estimated to be a $65 billion USD market that employs millions of human artists, sellers, and collectors globally. Recent attention paid to AI-made art in prestigious galleries, museums, and popular media has provoked debate around how these statistics will change. Unanswered questions fuel growing anxieties.

Are AI-made and human-made art evaluated in the same ways? How will growing exposure to AI-made art impact evaluations of human creativity? Our research uses a psychological lens to explore these questions in the realm of visual art. We find that people devalue art labeled as AI-made across a variety of dimensions, even when they report it is indistinguishable from human-made art, and even when they believe it was produced collaboratively with... We also find that comparing images labeled as human-made to images labeled as AI-made increases perceptions of human creativity, an effect that can be leveraged to increase the value of human effort. Results are robust across six experiments (N = 2965) using a range of human-made and AI-made stimuli and incorporating representative samples of the US population.

Finally, we highlight conditions that strengthen effects as well as dimensions where AI-devaluation effects are more pronounced. Subject terms: Psychology, Human behaviour The contemporary art world is conservatively estimated to be a $65 billion USD market that employs millions of human artists, sellers, and collectors across the world1. Yet recent attention paid to art made by artificial intelligence (AI) in prestigious galleries2,3, museums4, and popular media5 has provoked heated debate around how these statistics will change in the future6,7. Anxiety around the changing value of human art is fueled by unanswered questions: Will art attributed to AI be evaluated in the same way as art attributed to humans? Should art markets even treat AI-made art as “art”?

Does growing exposure to AI-made art impact evaluations of solitary human creativity or, as is also happening, evaluations of human artists using AI? In a world where technology constantly evolves, AI art has emerged as a fascinating yet controversial topic. While some hail it as a groundbreaking innovation, others raise concerns about its impact on creativity and the art community. AI-generated art might seem impressive at first glance, but there’s more beneath the surface. Many fear that AI art could devalue human creativity, reducing centuries of artistic tradition to mere algorithms. Additionally, the ethical implications of AI art can’t be ignored, as it often borrows from existing works without proper attribution.

As we dive deeper, it’s essential to understand why AI art might not be as beneficial as it seems. The rise of AI-generated art introduces ethical and social concerns that society must address. These concerns span the impacts on human creativity and the economic implications for artists. AI art has sparked debates over its effect on human creativity. Critics argue that automating art creation through algorithms undermines the inherent value of human effort. They believe that creative expression, rooted in personal experiences and emotions, cannot be authentically replicated by machines.

For example, traditional artists infuse their work with a personal touch that conveys unique perspectives, an element often missing in AI-generated pieces. This reliance on AI tools may discourage individuals from honing personal artistic skills, thereby stifling innovation in the art world. The economic ramifications for artists are troubling. As AI-generated art gains popularity, many artists might find it harder to compete with machines that produce art at a fraction of the cost and time. Galleries and collectors may prefer cheaper AI-generated options, reducing demand for traditional art. A RAND Corporation report reveals that automation could disrupt creative industries, potentially displacing professional artists.

Consequently, emerging and established artists could face significant financial challenges, reshaping the entire art economy. Exploring the significant ethical, creative, and practical downsides surrounding the rapid rise of AI generated art and its impact. Artificial intelligence has burst onto the creative scene, offering tools that can generate stunning images with just a few text prompts. On the surface, it seems revolutionary, democratizing art creation and opening up new possibilities. But scratch beneath that glossy digital veneer, and you'll find a swirling vortex of controversy. While undeniably powerful, the rapid rise of AI generated art isn't without its significant drawbacks and ethical quandaries.

Many argue passionately that there are fundamental reasons why AI art is bad, or at least, deeply problematic. This isn't just about gatekeeping or a fear of new technology. The criticisms and downsides surrounding AI art touch on profound issues of creativity, ethics, labor, and even the very definition of art itself. From how the models are trained to the impact on human artists and the philosophical implications of machine-generated visuals, there's a lot to unpack. Let's delve into the core arguments against the uncritical embrace of AI generated imagery and explore the real-world concerns being raised by artists, thinkers, and observers alike. One of the most frequent and deeply felt criticisms of AI art is its perceived lack of "soul" or genuine human intent.

Art, throughout history, has been a reflection of the human experience – joy, sorrow, struggle, love, understanding. It's born from personal history, cultural context, and the artist's unique perspective filtered through their emotions and intellect. Can a machine, no matter how sophisticated, truly replicate that? An AI model, at its core, is an algorithm trained on massive datasets of existing images and text. It learns patterns, styles, and associations. When given a prompt, it uses these learned correlations to assemble pixels into an image.

It doesn't *feel* the prompt; it doesn't have life experiences informing its choices; it doesn't grapple with existential questions while selecting colors or shaping forms. It's an incredibly powerful pattern-matching and synthesis engine. For many, this fundamental difference means that while the *output* might look aesthetically pleasing or technically impressive, it lacks the depth, vulnerability, and authentic expression that defines human art. AI-generated content is reshaping the creative landscape, raising profound questions about originality, artistic value, and the role of human imagination. From AI-generated paintings and music to automated storytelling, machine-generated art blurs the boundary between human expression and algorithmic precision. This chapter explores how AI assists, competes with, and sometimes replaces human creativity.

While some artists and writers use AI as a tool for inspiration, others fear that automation diminishes creative depth and uniqueness. Industries once reliant on human innovation—graphic design, publishing, filmmaking—are increasingly integrating AI-driven solutions, challenging traditional notions of authorship and artistic merit. But can AI truly create, or does it merely imitate? This chapter examines whether AI-generated art can evoke genuine emotion, inspire cultural movements, or develop unique stylistic identities—or if it simply regurgitates patterns learned from human creators. As AI continues to advance, the future of creativity may depend on whether humans embrace collaboration or resist the rise of machine-made artistry. AI as an Artist: How AI tools generate paintings, music, poetry, and other forms of creative expression.

Negative Effects Of Ai Art Understanding The Impact On Creativity And

People Also Search

The Rise Of AI Art Has Changed How We See

This Instant Ability Has Led To A Rush Of People

Something Interesting Has Happened To Me Since Generative AI Emerged.

While AI Offers Unprecedented Tools For Ideation And Productivity, There

In Light Of This Idea, I Followed Up About The