Llm Pricing Top 15 Providers Compared In 2026 Aimultiple

Bonisiwe Shabane
-
llm pricing top 15 providers compared in 2026 aimultiple

LLM API pricing can be complex and depends on your preferred usage. We analyzed 15+ LLMs and their pricing and performance: Hover over model names to view their benchmark results, real-world latency, and pricing, to assess each model’s efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Ranking: Models are ranked by their average position across all benchmarks. You can check the hallucination rates and reasoning performance of top LLMs in our benchmarks. Figure 1: Example of tokenization using the GPT-4o & GPT-4o mini tokenizer for the sentence “Identify New Technologies, Accelerate Your Enterprise.”1

Compare leading models by quality, cost, and performance metrics in one place. Real-time Klu.ai data powers this leaderboard for evaluating LLM providers, enabling selection of the optimal API and model for your needs. The latest version of the AI model has significantly improved dataset demand and speed, ensuring more efficient chat and code generation, even across multilingual contexts like German, Chinese, and Hindi. Google's open LLM repository provides benchmarks that developers can use to identify wrong categories, especially in meta-inspired tests and other benchmarking efforts. However, latency issues remain a concern for AI models, particularly when processing large context windows or running complex comparisons between models in cost-sensitive environments. With the growing demand for datasets in various languages such as Spanish, French, Italian, and Arabic, benchmarking the quality and breadth of models against other benchmarks is essential for ensuring accurate metadata handling.

The Klu Index Score evaluates frontier models on accuracy, evaluations, human preference, and performance. It combines these indicators into one score, making it easier to compare models. This score helps identify models that best balance quality, cost, and speed for specific applications. Powered by real-time Klu.ai data as of 1/8/2026, this LLM Leaderboard reveals key insights into use cases, performance, and quality. GPT-4 Turbo (0409) leads with a 100 Klu Index score. o1-preview excels in complex reasoning with a 99 Klu Index.

GPT-4 Omni (0807) is optimal for AI applications with a speed of 131 TPS. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is best for chat and vision tasks, achieving an 82.25% benchmark average. Gemini Pro 1.5 is noted for reward modeling with a 73.61% benchmark average, while Claude 3 Opus excels in creative content with a 77.35% benchmark average. Compare price, performance, and speed across the entire AI ecosystem.Updated daily with the latest benchmarks. Top recommendations based on what matters most to you Ranked by Quality Index across all benchmarks

Jump straight to models optimized for your specific needs Best models for writing, reviewing, and debugging code Reach our project experts to estimate your dream project idea and make it a business reality. Talk to us about your product idea, and we will build the best tech product in the industry. <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-43934" src="https://www.prismetric.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Top-Large-Language-Models-as-of-2026.jpg" alt="Top Large Language Models as of 2026" width="1200" height="628" srcset="https://www.prismetric.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Top-Large-Language-Models-as-of-2026.jpg 1200w, https://www.prismetric.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Top-Large-Language-Models-as-of-2026-300x157.jpg 300w, https://www.prismetric.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Top-Large-Language-Models-as-of-2026-1024x536.jpg 1024w, https://www.prismetric.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Top-Large-Language-Models-as-of-2026-768x402.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /> I’ve spent the past year knee-deep in prompts, benchmarks, hallucinations, and breakthrough moments.

I’ve used every top LLM you’ve heard of, and plenty you haven’t. Some amazed me with surgical precision. Others tripped over basic math. A few blew through a month’s budget in a single weekend run. So, I stopped guessing. I started testing across real-world tasks that reflect how we actually use these models: coding, research, RAG pipelines, decision support, long-context summarization, and more.

Compare cost per token across all major LLM providers interactively. Use this live comparison table to explore and compare pricing details for popular LLM APIs like OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and Mistral. Easily sort and filter by provider, context window, and token pricing — all prices shown per 500, 1000, or 1M tokens. 🔎 Want to check our data sources? View all provider documentation. We’re just getting started.

This project is evolving — soon you’ll find:

People Also Search

LLM API Pricing Can Be Complex And Depends On Your

LLM API pricing can be complex and depends on your preferred usage. We analyzed 15+ LLMs and their pricing and performance: Hover over model names to view their benchmark results, real-world latency, and pricing, to assess each model’s efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Ranking: Models are ranked by their average position across all benchmarks. You can check the hallucination rates and reasoning p...

Compare Leading Models By Quality, Cost, And Performance Metrics In

Compare leading models by quality, cost, and performance metrics in one place. Real-time Klu.ai data powers this leaderboard for evaluating LLM providers, enabling selection of the optimal API and model for your needs. The latest version of the AI model has significantly improved dataset demand and speed, ensuring more efficient chat and code generation, even across multilingual contexts like Germ...

The Klu Index Score Evaluates Frontier Models On Accuracy, Evaluations,

The Klu Index Score evaluates frontier models on accuracy, evaluations, human preference, and performance. It combines these indicators into one score, making it easier to compare models. This score helps identify models that best balance quality, cost, and speed for specific applications. Powered by real-time Klu.ai data as of 1/8/2026, this LLM Leaderboard reveals key insights into use cases, pe...

GPT-4 Omni (0807) Is Optimal For AI Applications With A

GPT-4 Omni (0807) is optimal for AI applications with a speed of 131 TPS. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is best for chat and vision tasks, achieving an 82.25% benchmark average. Gemini Pro 1.5 is noted for reward modeling with a 73.61% benchmark average, while Claude 3 Opus excels in creative content with a 77.35% benchmark average. Compare price, performance, and speed across the entire AI ecosystem.Updated ...

Jump Straight To Models Optimized For Your Specific Needs Best

Jump straight to models optimized for your specific needs Best models for writing, reviewing, and debugging code Reach our project experts to estimate your dream project idea and make it a business reality. Talk to us about your product idea, and we will build the best tech product in the industry. <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-43934" src="https://www.prismetric.com/wp-content/uploads/2...