Hostile State Disinformation In The Internet Age Jstor
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium. State-sponsored disinformation (SSD) aimed at other nations' populations is a tactic that has been used for millennia. But SSD powered by internet social media is a far more powerful tool than the U.S. government had, until recently, assumed. Such disinformation can erode trust in government, set societal groups—sometimes violently—against each other, prevent national unity, amplify deep political and social divisions, and lead people to take disruptive action in the real world. In part because of a realization of the power of SSD, legislators, government officials, corporate officials, media figures, and academics have begun debating what measures might be appropriate to reduce the destructive effects of...
Most of the proposed solutions have technical or practical difficulties, but more important, they may erode the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and expression. Foreign powers, however, do not have First Amendment rights. Therefore, in keeping with the Constitution, the U.S. government can act to counter SSD if it can establish clearly that the information is being disseminated by a state actor. If the government can act constitutionally against SSD, can it do so effectively? Or are new legal authorities required?
The federal government already has numerous legal tools to restrict activity in the United States by hostile nations. Some of those tools have recently been used to address hostile powers' malign "influence operations," including internet-powered disinformation. Nonetheless, SSD from several nations continues. Russia in particular runs a sophisticated campaign aimed at America's fissures that has the potential to greatly amplify divisions in this country, negatively affect public policy, and perhaps stimulate violence. Russia has created or amplified disinformation targeting U.S. audiences on such issues as the character of U.S.
presidential candidates, the efficacy of vaccines, Martin Luther King Jr., the legitimacy of international peace accords, and many other topics that vary from believable to the outlandish. While the topics and the social media messages may seem absurd to many Americans, they do gain traction with some—perhaps enough to make a difference. There is every reason to believe that Russian SSD had a significant influence on, for example, the United Kingdom's referendum on Brexit and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. But acting to block such SSD does risk spilling over into actions limiting citizens' constitutional rights.
People Also Search
- Hostile State Disinformation in the Internet Age - JSTOR
- Hostile State Disinformation in the Internet Age - MIT Press
- Vol. 153, No. 3, Summer 2024 of Daedalus on JSTOR
- Commanding the Trend: Social Media as Information Warfare - JSTOR
- Disinformation and Democracy: the Internet Transformed Protest ... - Jstor
- The Global Organization of Social Media Disinformation Campaigns - Jstor
- Journal of Free Speech Law: "Hostile State Disinformation in the ...
- Volume 153 Issue 3 | Daedalus | MIT Press
- How Internet Platforms Are Combating Disinformation and ... - JSTOR
- Expert Insights on A Timely Policy Issue Todd C. Helmus ... - Jstor
A New Article From The Daedalus (Journal Of The American
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium. State-sponsored disinformation (SSD) aimed at other nations' populations is a tactic that has been used for millennia. But SSD powered by internet social media is a far more powerful tool than the U.S. government had, until recently, assumed. Such disinformation can erode trust i...
Most Of The Proposed Solutions Have Technical Or Practical Difficulties,
Most of the proposed solutions have technical or practical difficulties, but more important, they may erode the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech and expression. Foreign powers, however, do not have First Amendment rights. Therefore, in keeping with the Constitution, the U.S. government can act to counter SSD if it can establish clearly that the information is being disseminated by a stat...
The Federal Government Already Has Numerous Legal Tools To Restrict
The federal government already has numerous legal tools to restrict activity in the United States by hostile nations. Some of those tools have recently been used to address hostile powers' malign "influence operations," including internet-powered disinformation. Nonetheless, SSD from several nations continues. Russia in particular runs a sophisticated campaign aimed at America's fissures that has ...
Presidential Candidates, The Efficacy Of Vaccines, Martin Luther King Jr.,
presidential candidates, the efficacy of vaccines, Martin Luther King Jr., the legitimacy of international peace accords, and many other topics that vary from believable to the outlandish. While the topics and the social media messages may seem absurd to many Americans, they do gain traction with some—perhaps enough to make a difference. There is every reason to believe that Russian SSD had a sign...