University of Kwazulu-Natal

Ground News Media Bias Allsides

Bonisiwe Shabane
-
ground news media bias allsides

Accusations, polarization, and overt bias: it's everywhere. You can't turn on the news without witnessing a spectacle of diverse opinions. Most commonly, the reporter at-bat is calling the shots. The truth is, our society gives center stage to the person with the mic. News reporting isn't an arena of debate or thoughtful arguments. When you turn on the news, you are hearing one person's side of the story.

And that hardly contributes to a well-rounded perspective. To separate the bias from the facts then requires an understanding of the sum of all those biases which form the lens through which an author, an editor, a publication and its sponsors write... An informed news reader today needs to read the perspective of multiple media sources knowing that no single media source can consistently and reliably if ever, provide an unbiased view of the facts, especially... The bias can be not only domestically political in nature, such as the case of disagreement on issues between two political parties, but also geopolitical, where each nation or multinational alliance has its own... As far back as the Gold Rush, newspapers took sides and overtly endorsed or vehemently opposed political candidates. Even in the 1970s, most journalists were working-class people who didn't have a university education.

Once journalism was a credentialed career that required a college degree, graduates began to reflect the political leanings of their respective educational institutions. Several landmark events in the last few decades have dramatically impacted the news we read about today. This is because ideological shifts have occurred. These, in response to world events, have continued a trajectory of leftist or rightist leanings in various news platforms. For example: The Wall Street Journal reported, "the whole Vietnam effort may be doomed." In 1971, other newspapers carried narratives about the "unjust" war that was "sold" to Congress.

The 1960s and 1970s changed reporting and politics in huge ways. Political bias was rife, with scathing editorials and reporters who made no secret of their involvement with protests and social movements. With the dawn of television, new media created a monopolistic hold on public attention. This had a two-fold effect of catapulting reporters to movie star status and further polarizing average citizens. TV anchors started having fan following and their 'take' on news polarized the viewers even more as they fought for more eyeballs. Now, they not only had parties to align with but also platforms.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.0) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.2) Country: Canada MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT Media Type: Website/App Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY Founded in 2018 by Harleen Kaur and Sukh Singh, Ground News is a mobile app, browser extension, and website that curates/aggregates news stories from numerous sources and labels the source by bias rating. According to their about page, they state, “Looking to break free from your echo chamber?

We’ve already helped over 150,000 escape theirs and see the news from a different perspective. Ground News was created to be a news destination for everyone, regardless of political ideology.” Read our profile on Canadien media and government. Snapwise Inc., an Ontario, Canada-based company, owns Ground News. Ground News generates revenue through subscription fees to unlock full content. Luigi Mangione appeared for a pretrial hearing at Manhattan Supreme Court on Monday, as his defense team attempted to block evidence from his state trial for the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

The Details: Mangione was permitted to wear civilian clothing and was released from handcuffs during the hearing, which is expected to continue throughout the week. His defense team argued that law enforcement unconstitutionally searched his backpack, which held an illegally-possessed handgun, ammunition, and an incriminating notebook, upon his arrest. Law enforcement claimed to be checking the backpack for a bomb, which Mangione's lawyers said was a mere excuse to act without a search warrant. The lawyers reportedly seek to block the Manhattan district attorney's office from using the backpack's evidence during Mangione's state trial. Newsweek (Center bias) only noted efforts to block the prosecution's use of the notebook. The defense team also said that some of Mangione's initial statements should be made inadmissible because his Miranda Rights had not been read.

Federal prosecutors argued that his statements were voluntary and made before his arrest, which would make them valid. For Context: Mangione, 27, was accused of publicly killing Thompson in New York City on Dec. 4, 2024. After his arrest in Altoona, Penn., five days after the fatal shooting, he pleaded not guilty to state and federal murder charges. Two state terrorism charges were dismissed in September. If found guilty of the state charges, Mangione could face a life sentence.

The Justice Department (DOJ) reportedly directed federal prosecutors in April to seek the death penalty. Neither trial is scheduled, but a federal hearing is set for Jan. 9, 2026. How The Media Covered It: While Associated Press (Left) said Mangione "watched stoically in court" as the prosecution showed videos of the murder, New York Post (Lean Right) noted instead that he "broadly grinned... Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more.

Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary. AllSides and Ground News are both news aggregation websites that aim to provide readers with a balanced view of current events. AllSides focuses on presenting news stories from a variety of sources across the political spectrum, allowing users to see how different outlets are covering the same topic. Ground News, on the other hand, uses a unique algorithm to analyze news articles and determine their political bias, providing readers with a visual representation of how different sources are reporting on a particular... Both platforms offer valuable tools for readers seeking to understand the full scope of a news story and make informed decisions about the information they consume.

AllSides and Ground News are two popular news aggregation websites that aim to provide readers with a balanced view of the news. Both platforms use algorithms to analyze news articles from various sources and categorize them based on their political bias. However, there are some key differences between the two platforms that set them apart. AllSides categorizes news articles into three main categories: left, center, and right. This allows readers to easily see how different sources are covering the same story from different perspectives. On the other hand, Ground News uses a color-coded system to indicate the political bias of each news source.

This system provides a quick visual reference for readers to understand the bias of the sources they are reading. AllSides includes a wide range of sources from across the political spectrum, including mainstream media outlets, independent news sites, and opinion blogs. This diversity of sources helps to provide a comprehensive view of the news landscape. In contrast, Ground News focuses on mainstream media sources and does not include as many independent or alternative news sources. This may limit the range of perspectives available to readers. AllSides has a clean and user-friendly interface that makes it easy for readers to navigate the site and find the information they are looking for.

The site is well-organized and visually appealing, with clear labels and categories. Ground News also has a user-friendly interface, but some users may find the color-coding system confusing or overwhelming at first. However, once users understand how the system works, it can be a helpful tool for identifying bias in news sources. Ground News promises to cut through media bias and deliver the facts. Does it? At first glance, Ground News looks like any other news aggregator.

The site displays a menu of trending news topics: Israel-Gaza, artificial intelligence, Donald Trump. In the feed below is a list of headlines. On the afternoon of Wednesday, September 3, 2025, the headline at the top of that list is “Florida becomes first state to end all vaccine mandates for schools.” But there’s no news source attached... Instead, there is a blue, white, and red graph showing something Ground News calls “bias distribution,” and a handful of AI-generated bullet points. To find the sources for this headline, readers must click on it and then scroll down to a feed that lists news stories from outlets classified as “left,” “right,” or “center.” The Florida headline... Readers then have the option to click through to read the full articles.

The site also assigns each outlet a “factuality rating” for how accurate and trustworthy it is as a source, though that feature is paywalled. The tagline of Ground News is “See every side of every news story.” It aggregates articles from more than forty thousand free and subscription outlets, then uses AI to publish a daily average of... The idea is that by presenting a story as a synthesis of articles from outlets across the political spectrum, readers will be able to bypass the bias inherent in any one publication and see... “When a news event happens, it passes through the prism of our media landscape and shatters into competing narratives,” Harleen Kaur, a former aerospace engineer who is now cofounder and CEO of Ground News,... She added: “After working in areas as complex as space exploration and jet engines, it struck me as unimaginable that we don’t have a simple way to assess the facts about what’s happening around... There is no doubt that the modern media ecosystem is confusing, sharply polarized, and full of misinformation—all conditions that have eroded the public’s trust in news institutions.

More than half of Americans say they prefer news with “no particular point of view,” according to a study published in the International Journal of Communication. Trust in national news organizations started dipping in the mid-eighties and went downhill from there; by the late 2010s, the majority of people surveyed said that the news media was “often inaccurate.” This belief... Distrust of news media is particularly pronounced among Republicans, only 53 percent of whom say they have at least some trust in mainstream news, compared with 81 percent of Democrats.

People Also Search

Accusations, Polarization, And Overt Bias: It's Everywhere. You Can't Turn

Accusations, polarization, and overt bias: it's everywhere. You can't turn on the news without witnessing a spectacle of diverse opinions. Most commonly, the reporter at-bat is calling the shots. The truth is, our society gives center stage to the person with the mic. News reporting isn't an arena of debate or thoughtful arguments. When you turn on the news, you are hearing one person's side of th...

And That Hardly Contributes To A Well-rounded Perspective. To Separate

And that hardly contributes to a well-rounded perspective. To separate the bias from the facts then requires an understanding of the sum of all those biases which form the lens through which an author, an editor, a publication and its sponsors write... An informed news reader today needs to read the perspective of multiple media sources knowing that no single media source can consistently and reli...

Once Journalism Was A Credentialed Career That Required A College

Once journalism was a credentialed career that required a college degree, graduates began to reflect the political leanings of their respective educational institutions. Several landmark events in the last few decades have dramatically impacted the news we read about today. This is because ideological shifts have occurred. These, in response to world events, have continued a trajectory of leftist ...

The 1960s And 1970s Changed Reporting And Politics In Huge

The 1960s and 1970s changed reporting and politics in huge ways. Political bias was rife, with scathing editorials and reporters who made no secret of their involvement with protests and social movements. With the dawn of television, new media created a monopolistic hold on public attention. This had a two-fold effect of catapulting reporters to movie star status and further polarizing average cit...

These Sources Have Minimal Bias And Use Very Few Loaded

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED (0.0) Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.2) Country: Canada MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: EXCELLENT Media Type: Website/App Traffic...