Greptile Ai Coding Report 2025 Review Has Ai Really Improved Productiv

Bonisiwe Shabane

-Jan 11, 2026, 10:36 PM

greptile ai coding report 2025 review has ai really improved productiv

A cross-industry study on recent trends in AI software development. Measuring productivity gains across development workflows Tracking the rise of AI-powered development tools Performance benchmarks across latency, cost, and tokenization Recent papers on foundational models and applications Analyzing Greptile's State of AI Coding 2025 report and examining the real productivity changes AI has brought to development, combined with personal experience.

Greptile’s “The State of AI Coding 2025” report has been gaining significant attention in the industry. This report quantitatively analyzes how AI coding tools have actually impacted developer productivity, based on data from March to November 2025. In this article, I’ll summarize the key findings from the report and discuss the practical changes that AI coding tools have brought, based on my personal experience. Note: This article is a review of the Greptile State of AI Coding 2025 report. Here are the most notable figures from the report: In 2025, 84% of developers use AI tools that now write 41% of all code.

This report highlights key 2025 statistics on how AI coding tools impact developer productivity, accuracy, and satisfaction. It covers adoption rates, trust issues, and real performance gains from tools like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT. In 2025, AI tools have become co-workers for developers, not just assistants. From writing and debugging code to automating documentation, they now shape how developers think, build, and deliver software. Reports show that 84% of developers use or plan to use AI tools, and 41% of all code is already AI-generated. This report compiles key statistics from verified online sources and our own research to show how tools like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT are changing developer productivity, code quality, and work satisfaction.

AI‑powered PR reviews with full codebase context—merge 50–80 % faster and catch 3× more bugs. Greptile is an AI-driven code review bot designed to analyze your pull requests (PRs) with a deep understanding of your entire repository. It generates in-line comments on bugs, anti-patterns, performance, security, and compliance issues, plus automated fix suggestions. It also provides natural-language summaries for each PR, enabling engineering teams to merge PRs significantly faster (up to 80 %) while catching up to three times more issues than typical reviews . The tool supports custom style guides and compliance rules, and can be self-hosted or integrated via API, Slack, GitHub, GitLab, and Zapier. It handles 30+ languages, adjusts to your team’s conventions, offers a 14‑day free trial (no credit card), and includes free/open source options for open‑source projects and early-stage startups .

Code reviews are not every developer’s favorite part of software development. AI-powered pull request tools offer a balm to developer pain and toil. The process of software PRs can be full of spending time catching typos, obvious bugs and style issues. Other aspects of development can get rushed or fall behind because everyone’s review-fatigued. I’ve been skeptical but interested in AI PR tools. How good could they be and how much could they fulfill what I see as a promise of AI: freeing devs up for higher-level thinking in comparison to drudge work?

I decided to test one (Greptile) on a personal project: Solace, which uses a Golang backend serving up an HTMX frontend. I used three tools in the process: Greptile, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor. Each promised something a bit different from the others, and Cursor was used for parts of the actual coding process. AI did review AI-written code at points here. In this blog I’m going to focus on Greptile, because it really deserves a look, and the other two tools are getting wider adoption and name recognition anyway. GitHub Copilot has just gone GA, while Greptile is a more mature project that I’ve been tinkering with for a bit.

Greptile also includes chatting with codebases, which was my major use case to begin with. Solace was well-suited for testing as it involved several types of changes during the time I was testing: framework migrations, database integrations, form implementations and API refactoring are examples. AI tools need to be able to handle a variety of scenarios to be useful. Software teams are facing mounting challenges with bugs, security, and technical debt, and better code quality starts with AI developer tools says Greptile, urging companies to adopt intelligent solutions that boost productivity and maintainability. Greptile, the provider of AI-powered code review solutions, recently announced its vision for transforming software development through artificial intelligence (AI) developer tools, emphasizing the growing necessity of integrating these technologies into modern development workflows... Greptile highlights that poor code quality is not merely an inconvenience, it represents a significant business risk.

Issues such as bugs, security vulnerabilities, and technical debt can derail projects and inflate costs, with some industry estimates suggesting that the cost of fixing post-release defects can be up to 100 times higher... Modern software teams face mounting challenges, including: To address these concerns, Greptile advocates for the adoption of AI-powered developer tools. As code velocity increases, code review becomes the bottleneck. Teams risk bad code reaching production, creating security issues or new bugs. The solution is AI code reviews.

AI code review tools like Greptile act as a line of defense against bugs in production. Read on to learn how AI code review works, and why top teams use it to maintain high-quality standards. AI code reviews improve the traditional pull request (PR) process by automatically analyzing changes, identifying potential bugs or security issues, and providing context-aware feedback before human reviewers step in. In most modern software teams, engineers review each other's code as a PR before merging into the main codebase, ensuring changes meet standards and don't introduce problems. This peer review process helps catch bugs, maintain consistent practices, and preserve overall code quality. As velocity rises, engineers are more likely to miss nuances and PRs stack up.

That slows merges and can introduce bugs when teams cut corners to clear the bottleneck.

Greptile Ai Coding Report 2025 Review Has Ai Really Improved Productiv

People Also Search

A Cross-industry Study On Recent Trends In AI Software Development.

Greptile’s “The State Of AI Coding 2025” Report Has Been

This Report Highlights Key 2025 Statistics On How AI Coding

AI‑powered PR Reviews With Full Codebase Context—merge 50–80 % Faster

Code Reviews Are Not Every Developer’s Favorite Part Of Software