Fact Check What Did Kirk Say About Melissa Hortman

Bonisiwe Shabane
-
fact check what did kirk say about melissa hortman

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. Available reporting shows wide circulation of many of Charlie Kirk’s controversial public remarks after his September 2025 killing, but the provided sources do not quote a single, definitive “exact comment” he made specifically about... Fact-checkers and news outlets note social-media claims that Republicans failed to condemn the Hortman killing were false or misleading and cite specific republican condemnations, while opinion pieces debate the differing public responses [4] [2]... 1. What the sources actually record about Kirk’s words

The sources assembled here collect many of Charlie Kirk’s public, often incendiary remarks and compile them after his assassination — including racist, sexist, and provocative lines made onstage and on his show — but... Fact-checking and quote-collection outlets pictured in the results focus on Kirk’s public record at large rather than a single Hortman-specific statement [6] [7]. 2. Why Melissa Hortman’s name appears in the post-shooting coverage After the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, social media claims offering political views of the assassination and the reaction to it quickly spread. One message falsely claimed that “not a single Republican condemned” the targeted shooting of a Democratic politician in Minnesota in June.

Many Republicans, including President Donald Trump, condemned it. Kirk, the founder of the conservative youth political group Turning Point USA and an ally of Trump, was speaking at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on Sept. 10 when he was shot and killed. He was 31 years old. The FBI said on Sept. 11 that it had recovered what is believed to be the weapon used, “a high-powered bolt action rifle,” and law enforcement was still searching for a suspect.

The FBI released images of a “person of interest.” Trump and politicians of both political parties, including former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, made statements condemning the killing and expressing condolences. A reader asked us about the validity of one social media message that highlighted the statements of Democrats and then falsely said Republicans hadn’t offered similar condemnations of political violence after the murder of... A Sept. 10 post on X, which received more than 6 million views, wrongly said: “I would like it to be noted that every Democrat on Twitter,” including Newsom, “is condemning the shooting of Charlie Kirk...

Minnesota House of Representatives Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, a Democrat, and her husband, Mark Hortman, were slain on June 14, and Democratic state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were also shot but survived an assault by the same man, who was posing as a police officer. Vance Boelter, 57, was indicted on six federal charges in connection with the murder of the Minnesota lawmaker and her spouse and the stalking and shooting of the Hoffmans. Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. The analyses provided do not contain any information about what Charlie Kirk said about the murder of Melissa Hortman [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8].

In fact, most sources do not mention Charlie Kirk's statement about the murder of Melissa Hortman, but instead discuss the murder of Melissa Hortman and its connection to a broader wave of political violence... Some sources focus on the political aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination [5], the FBI response to political violence like the killings of Charlie Kirk and Rep. Melissa Hortman [6], or the death of Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman in the context of political violence and former President Barack Obama's address on the issue [7]. Key points to note are that none of the sources provide a direct quote or statement from Charlie Kirk about the murder of Melissa Hortman, and the information provided is largely focused on the... 2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement The original statement may be misleading as it implies that Charlie Kirk made a statement about the murder of Melissa Hortman, when in fact, none of the sources provided contain such information [1] [2]... This could be an attempt to manipulate public opinion or create a false narrative about the relationship between Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman. The sources provided do not offer a clear or unbiased account of the events, and may be selectively presenting information to support a particular agenda or viewpoint [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]... Those who benefit from this framing may be individuals or groups seeking to exploit the situation for political gain, or to promote a particular ideology [4] [3] [6] [7].

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. The original statement inquires about Charlie Kirk's statement on Melissa Hortman's murder. However, upon reviewing the analyses provided, it becomes clear that none of the sources directly mention Charlie Kirk making a statement about Melissa Hortman's murder [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. The sources do discuss the assassinations of Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman, as well as the reactions of various individuals and lawmakers to these events [2] [6]. Some sources also mention the need for civility and collective soul-searching in the face of political violence [2].

Additionally, the sources provide information on the aftermath of the assassinations, including efforts to censure Rep. Ilhan Omar for her comments on Kirk's death and the introduction of resolutions to honor Kirk and punish his opponents [4]. The investigation into the suspect's motives and the special election to fill Melissa Hortman's seat are also mentioned [5] [6]. The sources consistently fail to provide any information on Charlie Kirk's statement regarding Melissa Hortman's murder, suggesting that such a statement may not exist or may not be publicly available [1] [3] [4] [8]. 2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key piece of missing context is the lack of information on Charlie Kirk's statement regarding Melissa Hortman's murder, which is the central inquiry of the original statement [1] [3] [4] [8]. Alternative viewpoints that could provide more insight into this issue are not presented in the analyses, potentially due to the absence of publicly available information on Charlie Kirk's statement [1] [4]. Additionally, the sources primarily focus on the reactions of lawmakers and others to the assassinations, rather than exploring the potential motivations or consequences of these events [2] [6]. The sources also do not provide a clear timeline of events or a comprehensive overview of the investigations into the assassinations, which could help to contextualize the original statement [5] [8]. Furthermore, the sources do not mention the potential impact of Charlie Kirk's statement, if it exists, on the public discourse or the investigation into Melissa Hortman's murder [2]. 3.

Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. Charlie Kirk’s remarks about Melissa Hortman arose in a fraught national conversation after two high‑profile killings; reporting and commentary portray a clear contrast in public reactions along partisan lines, with the right amplifying Kirk’s... Recent commentary and reporting through mid‑September 2025 show disputes over whether Republicans created a memorial narrative for Kirk while Democrats and some media treated Hortman’s death differently, generating accusations of selective empathy and political... 1.

How the Narrative Split — Two Murders, Two Memorials? Coverage and essays argue that the killings of Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman produced two distinct public memorials, shaped by partisan networks and media ecosystems. Anand Giridharadas framed the difference as the right investing effort to create meaning around Kirk’s death while the left did not reciprocate for Hortman, pointing to movement leadership and parasocial bonds as drivers [1]. Reporting in mid‑September 2025 documented critiques of specific Republican responses that honored Kirk while allegedly mocking or minimizing Hortman’s murder, amplifying a perception that political identity influenced commemoration [4]. 2. What Charlie Kirk Actually Said — Context and Omission

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. The analyses provided do not contain any information about Charlie Kirk making statements regarding Melissa Hortman's murder [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. In fact, the sources suggest that Charlie Kirk was the one who was assassinated, not the one making statements about Melissa Hortman's murder [3] [4]. The lack of information about Charlie Kirk's statements on Melissa Hortman's murder is a consistent theme across all analyses. Some sources discuss the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination and its relation to Melissa Hortman's death, but do not mention Charlie Kirk making any statements about her murder [2] [4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints A key piece of missing context is the fact that Melissa Hortman was a Speaker Emerita who was assassinated, as mentioned in some of the analyses [4]. This context is crucial in understanding the situation, as it highlights the severity of the events being discussed. Another missing context is the response of political leaders to the assassinations, including statements from Barack Obama and Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries [3] [4]. Alternative viewpoints on the issue of political violence and the need for civility in the face of tragedy are also presented in some analyses [2] [5].

The role of rhetoric in potentially increasing political violence is also discussed, emphasizing the need for political leaders to work together to reduce polarization [5]. 3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. Are Facebook ads helping users buy illegal drugs by mail in Canada - Drugs travel through an ad to a postal delivery; $9 million worth of illegal drugs were turned over to police in... Correction & clarification: A prior version of this story had the wrong family name in a social media post. The Sept. 10 shooting of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk reminded some Minnesotans of June 14, when two Minnesota state lawmakers were shot in what has been reported as targeted attacks. Kirk, a conservative activist, died Wednesday, Sept.

10, after he was shot during an event at Utah Valley University. Minnesota's shootings resulted in the death of Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. Her dog, Gilbert, also died. State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were injured.

People Also Search

Whether You Agree Or Disagree With Our Analysis, These Conversations

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. Available reporting shows wide circulation of many of Charlie Kirk’s controversial public remarks after his September 2025 killing, but the provided sources do not quote a single, definitive “exact comment” he made spec...

The Sources Assembled Here Collect Many Of Charlie Kirk’s Public,

The sources assembled here collect many of Charlie Kirk’s public, often incendiary remarks and compile them after his assassination — including racist, sexist, and provocative lines made onstage and on his show — but... Fact-checking and quote-collection outlets pictured in the results focus on Kirk’s public record at large rather than a single Hortman-specific statement [6] [7]. 2. Why Melissa Ho...

Many Republicans, Including President Donald Trump, Condemned It. Kirk, The

Many Republicans, including President Donald Trump, condemned it. Kirk, the founder of the conservative youth political group Turning Point USA and an ally of Trump, was speaking at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on Sept. 10 when he was shot and killed. He was 31 years old. The FBI said on Sept. 11 that it had recovered what is believed to be the weapon used, “a high-powered bolt action rif...

The FBI Released Images Of A “person Of Interest.” Trump

The FBI released images of a “person of interest.” Trump and politicians of both political parties, including former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, made statements condemning the killing and expressing condolences. A reader asked us about the validity of one social media message that highlighted the statements of Democrats and then falsely said Republicans ...

Minnesota House Of Representatives Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, A Democrat,

Minnesota House of Representatives Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, a Democrat, and her husband, Mark Hortman, were slain on June 14, and Democratic state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were also shot but survived an assault by the same man, who was posing as a police officer. Vance Boelter, 57, was indicted on six federal charges in connection with the murder of the Minnesota lawmaker an...