Fact Check Did The Bullet That Killed Charlie Match The Gun Found

Bonisiwe Shabane

-Nov 19, 2025, 12:26 AM

fact check did the bullet that killed charlie match the gun found

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. The analyses provided do not offer a direct confirmation that the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk matched the gun found at the scene [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. However, multiple sources suggest a link between the suspect and the crime scene through DNA evidence. For instance, DNA on a towel wrapped around the suspected gun was matched to the suspect [2] [3] [5]. Additionally, DNA consistent with the suspect's was found on the trigger and other parts of the rifle, as well as on a fired cartridge casing [6].

The gun in question is identified as a Mauser model 98 rifle [1] [6], but none of the sources directly confirm whether the specific bullet that killed Charlie Kirk was matched to this gun. 2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints 3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement The original statement implies a direct connection between the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk and the gun found at the scene, which may not be entirely accurate based on the provided analyses [1] [2]...

This framing could benefit those seeking to simplify the narrative of the investigation, potentially at the expense of accuracy. On the other hand, a more nuanced understanding of the evidence, highlighting both the DNA links and the lack of direct confirmation on the bullet's origin, could benefit the pursuit of a thorough and... The sources provided do not explicitly indicate bias but emphasize the importance of forensic evidence in linking the suspect to the crime scene [2] [3] [5] [6], which is a crucial aspect of criminal... Does evidence support a claim that Charlie Kirk murder investigators "confirmed" they found a bullet in Kirk's body and a second bullet at the scene of the shooting? No, that's not true: Investigators have made no such public disclosures ahead of the October 30, 2025 hearing scheduled in the case. The claim was published and promoted by a clickbait website and a Facebook page operated from Vietnam and Thailand.

The text of the claim was determined to be AI-generated and it provided no documentary, eyewitness or official evidence by which to independently corroborate the claim. The claim appeared in an October 12, 2025 Facebook post (archived here) where it was published on the page of The World Daily with text that began: "A single bullet found at the Charlie... This is what the post looked like on Facebook at the time of writing: (Image source: Lead Stories screenshot taken at TheWorldDaily Facebook page.) There is no such announcement on the public web pages of the Utah County Attorney, (archived here) which is prosecuting the accused killer of Charlie Kirk. I was hesitant to write this because I do not want to feed the prurient interest of the just curious.

However, there is a lot of bad information and wild speculation being published and I want to present you with some video and photographic evidence that debunks one of these claims. I am particularly addressing the claim that Charlie Kirk was shot from behind. That is not true. The shot that killed Mr. Kirk came from the front, and I will prove that. In reaching these conclusions I consulted with one of my students who served as a Navy corpsman in combat and who also was a certified US Marine Corps sniper.

Let’s start with the shockwave of the bullet. A bullet moving through the air at a supersonic speed creates a shadow in the air as pictured in the photo at the top of this article. I am posting the full video of the examination of supersonic versus sub-sonic rounds, i.e., a supersonic round travels at a speed greater than 1,125 feet-per-second. The bullet that killed Charlie Kirk was a supersonic round. Son of the New American Revolution is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

I will post below the link to the video that I used to copy the still images that appear in this post (WARNING: The video is graphic and disturbing; I do not earn any... This is the image showing the moment before Charlie is shot. Note the lettering on the front of his t-shirt. On Friday, Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old Utah native, was identified by federal law enforcement as a suspect in the murder of Charlie Kirk. During Friday’s press conference, officials said that several bullet casings recovered from a hunting rifle found near the crime scene had messages inscribed on them. During the press conference, officials appeared to take the inscriptions literally, to the extent they ascribed meaning to them at all.

But the four messages apparently written by the alleged shooter instead seem to invoke a variety of memes and video game references. One of the casings was said to be engraved with the phrase “Hey Fascist! Catch!” followed by an up arrow, a right arrow, and three downward-facing arrows. That sequence is an apparent reference to the “Eagle 500kg bomb” in the popular third-person-shooter game Helldivers 2. The bomb has become a meme in the Helldivers community for being comically excessive. Arrowhead Game Studios, the developers of Helldivers 2, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from WIRED.

Launched in 2024, the game has grown a cult following for its Starship Troopers–like storyline. The cooperative shooter allows teams of up to four players, called “Helldivers,” to spread “freedom” across a fictional universe—fighting bugs, robots, and squid-like aliens rather than other humans. Their form of managed democracy is “basically fascism,” says independent extremism researcher Harry Batchelor, who works with the Extremism and Gaming Research Network. Helldivers 2 is satire, and the vast majority of players are in on it. The game, says Batchelor, “takes “the whole ‘pretending to be democracy while actually being a fascist government’ so seriously, it's obviously a joke.” The community around the game has generally maintained a positive reputation,... Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy.

We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. Reporting assembled from the supplied itemized analyses shows no primary source in the set explicitly states that the fatal bullet recovered from the crime scene. Multiple articles describe physical evidence found in connection with the alleged shooter — a rifle located in a wooded area with a spent round and three unspent rounds, DNA recovered from the discarded rifle,... Medical commentary cited in the dataset describes an absence of an exit wound, with a surgeon and a member of Kirk’s team attributing bullet stoppage to high bone density [4] [5]. Other pieces raise investigative concerns about scene handling and possible evidence disturbance as construction proceeds, suggesting that if a bullet were present it might be lost or not publicly accounted for [6]. Court-reporting materials focus on procedural developments: a suspect’s court appearances, evidence described generally as DNA and a family rifle, and defense requests for more time to review discovery — none provide a chain-of-custody statement...

In short, the available texts collectively describe related physical evidence and medical observations, but they do not contain a clear, documented claim that the fatal bullet was recovered and forensically linked to the weapon... 2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints Key contextual gaps in the assembled analyses include the absence of explicit forensic-chain details, public laboratory reports, or law-enforcement press releases confirming recovery and ballistic matching of a fatal projectile. The dataset references a spent round found with the rifle and DNA evidence, but does not include confirmation whether a bullet was extracted from the victim, cataloged, or ballistically matched to the rifle [1]... Medical commentary about no exit wound explains why an internal bullet could exist, but the records here lack mention of autopsy, radiology (X-ray/CT) documentation, or prosecutorial affidavits stating that an internal projectile was recovered...

Alternative viewpoints not present in the supplied material would include direct statements from the coroner, the investigating agency (local police, county or federal), or forensic laboratory chain-of-custody logs; these would either confirm recovery and... Additionally, the critical timelines of scene processing and whether construction or site clearance occurred prior to full forensic documentation are asserted by one item as a concern but lack corroborating official incident logs or... These omissions matter because they determine whether the physical link between weapon and wound is demonstrable or remains circumstantial in available public reporting [3] [8]. 3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy.

We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. The original statement claims that the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk was a .30-06. According to sources [1], [2], and [3], the rifle used in the crime was a Mauser .30-06-caliber bolt-action rifle, which suggests that the bullet was indeed a .30-06 [1] [2] [3]. However, sources [4], [5], and [6] do not mention the caliber of the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk, but do confirm that a Mauser bolt-action rifle was used in the crime [4] [5] [6]. Key points to note are the consistency in the type of rifle used across different sources, with sources [1] and [2] specifically identifying the rifle as a Mauser .30-06-caliber bolt-action rifle [1] [2]. 2.

Missing context/alternative viewpoints Some sources, such as [4], [5], and [6], do not provide information on the caliber of the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk [4] [5] [6]. This lack of information raises questions about the consistency of the evidence and highlights the need for further investigation. Additionally, source [5] mentions that the rifle was found near bullet casings with messages inscribed into them, including 'Hey fascist! Catch!' [5], which could provide insight into the motivations behind the crime. The fact that sources [1], [2], and [3] confirm the use of a Mauser .30-06-caliber bolt-action rifle, while sources [4], [5], and [6] do not mention the caliber, suggests that there may be different...

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way. The claim that Charlie Kirk was shot by a .3006 bullet is partially supported by some analyses [1] [2] [3], which mention that a high-powered bolt action rifle, specifically an imported Mauser .30-06 caliber... However, other analyses do not mention the caliber of the bullet that shot Charlie Kirk [4] [5] [6] [7] [8].

The presence of a .30-06 caliber rifle suggests that a .3006 bullet could have been used, but this is not explicitly confirmed by all sources [1] [2] [3]. It is essential to note that the caliber of the bullet is not universally reported across the analyses, with some sources focusing on the investigation and the spread of misinformation rather than the specifics... 2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints A key piece of missing context is the official confirmation of the bullet caliber used in the shooting, which is not provided by all sources [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Alternative viewpoints include the focus on the investigation and the spread of misinformation surrounding Charlie Kirk's death, rather than the specifics of the shooting [4] [5] [6] [7] [8].

Additionally, some sources highlight the criticism faced by FBI Director Kash Patel over the handling of the investigation [8]. The lack of cooperation from the suspect and the presence of engraved ammunition referencing video games and an anti-fascist song are also mentioned as relevant context [5]. These alternative viewpoints provide a more comprehensive understanding of the situation, beyond the specifics of the bullet caliber [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. 3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy.

Fact Check Did The Bullet That Killed Charlie Match The Gun Found

People Also Search

Whether You Agree Or Disagree With Our Analysis, These Conversations

The Gun In Question Is Identified As A Mauser Model

This Framing Could Benefit Those Seeking To Simplify The Narrative

The Text Of The Claim Was Determined To Be AI-generated

However, There Is A Lot Of Bad Information And Wild