Deep Dive Into Meta S Algorithms Shows That America S Political

FILE - This photo shows the mobile phone app logos for, from left, Facebook and Instagram in New York, Oct. 5, 2021. A team of some of the world’s leading social media researchers has published four studies looking at the relationship between the algorithms used by Facebook and Instagram and America’s widening political divide. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, file) WASHINGTON (AP) — The powerful algorithms used by Facebook and Instagram to deliver content to users have increasingly been blamed for amplifying misinformation and political polarization. But a series of groundbreaking studies published Thursday suggest addressing these challenges is not as simple as tweaking the platforms’ software.

The four research papers, published in Science and Nature, also reveal the extent of political echo chambers on Facebook, where conservatives and liberals rely on divergent sources of information, interact with opposing groups and... Algorithms are the automated systems that social media platforms use to suggest content for users by making assumptions based on the groups, friends, topics and headlines a user has clicked on in the past. While they excel at keeping users engaged, algorithms have been criticized for amplifying misinformation and ideological content that has worsened the country’s political divisions. Proposals to regulate these systems are among the most discussed ideas for addressing social media’s role in spreading misinformation and encouraging polarization. But when the researchers changed the algorithms for some users during the 2020 election, they saw little difference. WASHINGTON — The powerful algorithms used by Facebook and Instagram to deliver content to users have increasingly been blamed for amplifying misinformation and political polarization.

But a series of groundbreaking studies published Thursday suggest addressing these challenges is not as simple as tweaking the software that powers these platforms. The four research papers, published in Science and Nature, also reveal the extent of political echo chambers on Facebook, where conservatives and liberals rely on divergent sources of information, interact with opposing groups and... Algorithms are the automated systems that social media platforms use to suggest content for users by making assumptions based on the groups, friends, topics and headlines a user has clicked on in the past. While they excel at keeping users engaged, algorithms have been criticized for amplifying misinformation and ideological content that has worsened the country’s political divisions. Proposals to regulate these systems are among the most discussed ideas for addressing social media’s role in spreading misinformation and encouraging polarization. But when the researchers changed the algorithms for some users during the 2020 election, they saw little difference.

The former president warned that “citizens no longer know what to believe” thanks to false information spreading online. New research shows the impact that social media algorithms can have on partisan political feelings, using a new tool that hijacks the way platforms rank content. How much does someone’s social media algorithm really affect how they feel about a political party, whether it’s one they identify with or one they feel negatively about? Until now, the answer has escaped researchers because they’ve had to rely on the cooperation of social media platforms. New, intercollegiate research published Nov. 27 in Science, co-led by Northeastern University researcher Chenyan Jia, sidesteps this issue by installing an extension on consenting participants’ browsers that automatically reranks the posts those users see, in real time and still...

Jia and her team discovered that after one week, users’ feelings toward the opposing party shifted by about two points — an effect normally seen over three years — revealing algorithms’ strong influence on... A study shows that the order in which platforms like X display content to their users affects their animosity towards other ideological groups A team of U.S. researchers has shown that the order in which political messages are displayed on social media platforms does affect polarization — one of the most debated issues since the rise of social media and the... The phenomenon is equally strong regardless of the user’s political orientation, the academics note in an article published on Thursday in Science. Social media is an important source of political information.

For hundreds of millions of people worldwide, it is even the main channel for political engagement: they receive political content, share it, and express their opinions through these platforms. Given the relevance of social media in this sphere, understanding how the algorithms that operate on these platforms work is crucial — but opacity is the norm in the industry. That makes it extremely difficult to estimate the extent to which the selection of highlighted content shapes users’ political views. How did the researchers overcome algorithmic opacity to alter the order of posts that social media users see? Tiziano Piccardi from Stanford University and his colleagues developed a browser extension that intercepts and reorders the feed (the chronological timeline of posts) of certain social networks in real time. The tool uses a large language model (LLM) to assign a score to each piece of content, measuring the extent to which it contained “antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity” (AAPA).

Once scored, the posts were reordered one way or another — without any collaboration from the platform or reliance on its algorithm. The experiment involved 1,256 participants, who had all been duly informed. The study focused on X, as it is the social network most used in the U.S. for expressing political opinions, and it was conducted during the weeks leading up to the 2024 presidential election to ensure a high circulation of political messages. The powerful algorithms used by Facebook and Instagram to deliver content to users have increasingly been blamed for amplifying misinformation and political polarization. But a series of groundbreaking studies published Thursday suggest addressing these challenges is not as simple as tweaking the platforms' software.

The four research papers, published in Science and Nature, also reveal the extent of political echo chambers on Facebook, where conservatives and liberals rely on divergent sources of information, interact with opposing groups and... Algorithms are the automated systems that social media platforms use to suggest content for users by making assumptions based on the groups, friends, topics and headlines a user has clicked on in the past. While they excel at keeping users engaged, algorithms have been criticized for amplifying misinformation and ideological content that has worsened the country's political divisions. Proposals to regulate these systems are among the most discussed ideas for addressing social media's role in spreading misinformation and encouraging polarization. But when the researchers changed the algorithms for some users during the 2020 election, they saw little difference. "We find that algorithms are extremely influential in people's on-platform experiences and there is significant ideological segregation in political news exposure," said Talia Jomini Stroud, director of the Center for Media Engagement at the...

"We also find that popular proposals to change social media algorithms did not sway political attitudes." The powerful algorithms used by Facebook and Instagram to deliver content to users have increasingly been blamed for amplifying misinformation and political polarization. But a series of groundbreaking studies published Thursday suggest addressing these challenges is not as simple as tweaking the platforms' software. The four research papers, published in Science and Nature, also reveal the extent of political echo chambers on Facebook, where conservatives and liberals rely on divergent sources of information, interact with opposing groups and... Algorithms are the automated systems that social media platforms use to suggest content for users by making assumptions based on the groups, friends, topics and headlines a user has clicked on in the past. While they excel at keeping users engaged, algorithms have been criticized for amplifying misinformation and ideological content that has worsened the country's political divisions.

Proposals to regulate these systems are among the most discussed ideas for addressing social media's role in spreading misinformation and encouraging polarization. But when the researchers changed the algorithms for some users during the 2020 election, they saw little difference. “We find that algorithms are extremely influential in people's on-platform experiences and there is significant ideological segregation in political news exposure,” said Talia Jomini Stroud, director of the Center for Media Engagement at the... "We also find that popular proposals to change social media algorithms did not sway political attitudes." We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

“We find that algorithms are extremely influential in people's on-platform experiences and there is significant ideological segregation in political news exposure.” WASHINGTON (AP) — The powerful algorithms used by Facebook and Instagram to deliver content to users have increasingly been blamed for amplifying misinformation and political polarization. But a series of groundbreaking studies published Thursday suggest addressing these challenges is not as simple as tweaking the platforms’ software. The four research papers, published in Science and Nature, also reveal the extent of political echo chambers on Facebook, where conservatives and liberals rely on divergent sources of information, interact with opposing groups and... Algorithms are the automated systems that social media platforms use to suggest content for users by making assumptions based on the groups, friends, topics and headlines a user has clicked on in the past. While they excel at keeping users engaged, algorithms have been criticized for amplifying misinformation and ideological content that has worsened the country’s political divisions.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A team of some of the world’s leading social media researchers has published four studies looking at the relationship between the algorithms used by Facebook and Instagram and America’s widening political... The analysis examined user data from the 2020 election and found that changing the algorithms had little to no impact on people’s political attitudes. That suggested that addressing political polarization in the U.S. will require more than just new social media software. The analysis also showed how conservatives and liberals rely on different sources for news and information, and that conservatives encounter far more political misinformation on Facebook than liberals do. Algorithms are the automated systems that social media platforms use to suggest content for users.

People Also Search

• Deep dive into Meta's algorithms shows that America's political ...
• How Does Social Media Impact Political Polarization?
• Algorithms do widen the divide: Social media feeds shape political ...
• Deep Dive Into Meta's Algorithms Shows America's Political ... - Adweek
• Social media research tool lowers the political temperature
• Deep dive into Meta's algorithms shows that America's… - inkl