Combating Misinformation To Preserve Trust Disa

The Erosion of Truth in the Digital Age: The Urgent Need to Combat Misinformation The proliferation of misinformation on social media platforms poses a significant threat to democratic societies worldwide. The rapid spread of false and misleading information online has the potential to manipulate public opinion, influence elections, undermine trust in institutions, and even incite violence. The recent decision by Meta, Facebook’s parent company, to discontinue independent third-party fact-checking amplifies these concerns, potentially exacerbating the already rampant spread of misinformation and its deleterious effects on informed public discourse. With a vast majority of Americans now relying on digital platforms for news consumption, the unchecked dissemination of false narratives poses a clear and present danger to the integrity of democratic processes and the... The increasing reliance on social media platforms for news consumption has created a fertile ground for the proliferation of misinformation.

Platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and others have become primary sources of information for many, particularly younger generations. This shift away from traditional news outlets, coupled with the algorithmic amplification of sensational and emotionally charged content, creates an environment where misinformation can easily outcompete factual reporting. The algorithms, designed to maximize user engagement, often prioritize content that evokes strong emotional responses, regardless of its veracity. This can lead to the creation of echo chambers, where users are primarily exposed to information that reinforces their existing beliefs, further entrenching biases and making them more susceptible to manipulation. The distinction between misinformation and disinformation is crucial. Misinformation refers to inaccurate or misleading information spread without malicious intent, while disinformation is deliberately fabricated and disseminated with the intention to deceive.

Both forms of false information can have serious consequences, eroding trust in institutions, fueling social divisions, and hindering informed decision-making. Instances such as the "Pizzagate" conspiracy theory during the 2016 US elections and the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 demonstrate the real-world impact of false narratives. These examples highlight the potential for misinformation to not only distort public perception but also incite real-world harm, from vaccine hesitancy and resistance to public health measures to acts of violence and political instability. The responsibility for combating misinformation rests not solely on individuals but also on the social media platforms themselves. While some argue against platforms acting as arbiters of truth, their algorithms already play a significant role in shaping what information users see and share. This inherent influence necessitates a proactive approach to content moderation and fact-checking.

Platforms must prioritize accuracy and implement robust mechanisms to identify and flag potentially misleading content. Collaboration with independent fact-checking organizations is essential to ensure transparency and credibility in the verification process. Furthermore, platforms should invest in media literacy initiatives to empower users with the critical thinking skills necessary to discern credible information from fabricated narratives. The United States National Security Strategy recognizes the need to combat misinformation and disinformation to employ integrated deterrence successfully. The Air Force Culture and Language Center addresses that priority through an educational video series on its Culture Guide app focused on helping total force Airmen and the Department of Defense develop resilience to... “Strategic competitors like Russia and China, as well as Violent Extremist Organizations and non-political disrupters, use misinformation and disinformation campaigns to recruit members to their cause, divide our society domestically, and create rifts between...

Elizabeth Peifer, AFCLC’s Associate Professor of Regional and Cultural Studies (Europe). “We are less able to put up a strong defense if we are divided socially and if our alliances and partnerships are torn.” Dr. Peifer’s academic interests include radicalism and extremism, public memory and narrative, and European security issues. These diverse research areas converge on the problem of disinformation and its impact on military operations. Her study of factors that make disinformation effective led to developing this series as a constructive and practical approach to the problem.

The new four-part video series discusses vulnerabilities to misinformation and disinformation in the military setting and innovative tools and techniques for service members to detect, evaluate, and combat manipulative information to make informed decisions... Part one of the series provides an overview of the problem of disinformation and misinformation. Part two promotes greater self-awareness by analyzing aspects of cognitive behavior and social psychology that make individuals more susceptible to manipulation through disinformation. Part three helps viewers gain situational awareness with an understanding of the Internet and patterns of disinformation in the digital landscape. And finally, part four concludes the series with practical ways to protect against misinformation and disinformation with tools and techniques for evaluating online sources. Misinformation and disinformation can be a threat to our democracy.

It can divide communities. It can make it harder for people to make informed choices — at the ballot box, at the grocery store and at the doctor's office. No one is immune. "We just don't have the time, the cognitive resources or even the motivation to literally fact-check every piece of information that comes our way," says Briony Swire-Thompson, director of the Psychology of Misinformation Lab... People trust information more when it comes from sources or cultural contexts they are familiar with, so talking to your loved ones can make a difference. The big picture idea here?

Start from a place of connection, not correction. Here are six ways to combat misinformation. "[The terms] mis- and disinformation trigger a sort of reaction, and usually distaste," says Sarah Nguyễn, a doctoral candidate at the University of Washington Information School who studies how people share information with each... She says the terms have become politicized. A high-level, evidence-informed guide to some of the major proposals for how democratic governments, platforms, and others can counter disinformation. The Technology and International Affairs Program develops insights to address the governance challenges and large-scale risks of new technologies.

Our experts identify actionable best practices and incentives for industry and government leaders on artificial intelligence, cyber threats, cloud security, countering influence operations, reducing the risk of biotechnologies, and ensuring global digital inclusion. The goal of the Partnership for Countering Influence Operations (PCIO) is to foster evidence-based policymaking to counter threats in the information environment. Key roadblocks as found in our work include the lack of: transparency reporting to inform what data is available for research purposes; rules guiding how data can be shared with researchers and for what... Carnegie’s Information Environment Project is a multistakeholder effort to help policymakers understand the information environment, think through the impact of efforts to govern it, and identify promising interventions to foster democracy. Disinformation is widely seen as a pressing challenge for democracies worldwide. Many policymakers are grasping for quick, effective ways to dissuade people from adopting and spreading false beliefs that degrade democratic discourse and can inspire violent or dangerous actions.

Yet disinformation has proven difficult to define, understand, and measure, let alone address. The Rising Tide of Disinformation: A Call for Collective Action In the digital age, the proliferation of fake news has emerged as a significant threat to democratic values, social cohesion, and the very fabric of reality. The ease with which misinformation spreads online necessitates a concerted effort from governments, the private sector, and mainstream media to counter its insidious influence. This multifaceted problem demands a comprehensive strategy that addresses the root causes of fake news while safeguarding fundamental freedoms. Government Intervention: Balancing Freedom and Responsibility

Governments play a crucial role in combating disinformation without impinging on freedom of speech. Digital literacy programs are essential for empowering citizens to critically evaluate information and identify credible sources. Integrating media literacy into school curricula and launching public awareness campaigns can equip individuals with the skills to navigate the complex digital landscape. Legislation targeting malicious disinformation campaigns can also be effective, but it must be carefully crafted to avoid stifling legitimate dissent. Collaboration between law enforcement and social media platforms is vital for identifying and removing harmful content, particularly that which incites violence or manipulates public opinion. The Role of Tech Giants: Platform Accountability and Content Moderation

How can local government leaders counter the misleading and inaccurate messages that often dominate our information channels, especially after a disaster or when there’s a public health crisis? Explaining the problem and potential solutions, Eileen O’Connor, senior VP for Communications, Policy, and Advocacy, the Rockefeller Foundation, spoke at the National Homeland Security Consortium meeting in January 2024. Factors that have led to an increase in misinformation and disinformation include the ascendency of cable talk shows, new technologies, and the profit motive. The spree of buying and consolidating media outlets by large corporations has driven the effort to increase cash from ads to the bottom line. It also has led to cost reductions and the elimination of traditional reporting jobs, as well as newspapers themselves and news bureaus for those that remain. Broadcast news field coverage has often been replaced with talking heads and opinion shows for the same reason—it costs less.

As more people turn to the Internet for news and information, targeted ads and algorithms have become ways to spread false information or even to recruit terrorists. As a result of all these changes, people are less inclined to trust government and often turn to other sources of information in an emergency. To find those trusted messengers, O’Connor urges leaders to think about who they talk to on a daily basis, noting that it is important to build strong networks with a wide range of people... In an era when AI and ChatGPT are flourishing, the importance of media literacy is growing, she notes. In a time where data moves at the speed of light, the fight against misinformation has never been more crucial. With the world facing the challenges brought about by the swift propagation of false in…

Subscribe to Law + Koffee to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

People Also Search

• Combating Misinformation to Preserve Trust - DISA
• Developing Resilience to Misinformation and Disinformation
• Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis
• To combat misinformation, start with connection, not correction
• Countering Disinformation Effectively: An Evidence-Based Policy Guide ...
• PDF Public Affairs and Combating Disinformation - DTIC
• Combating Misinformation | DISA
• Recommendations for countering misinformation
• Five Tips to Combat Misinformation and Disinformation
• Combating Disinformation: A Coordinated Effort for Safeguarding Trust