Charlie Kirk Assassination Analysis Two Guns One Shooter Mysterylores

Bonisiwe Shabane

-Nov 18, 2025, 8:59 PM

charlie kirk assassination analysis two guns one shooter mysterylores

People gather at a makeshift memorial for political activist and Turning Point USA Founder Charlie Kirk outside of the Turning Point USA headquarters in Phoenix, Ariz., on Sept. 14. Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images hide caption Prosecutors in Utah appear to be preparing to argue that 22-year-old Tyler Robinson killed conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah last week because he disagreed with Kirk's anti-trans rhetoric. In their charging document, authorities cite text messages that Robinson allegedly exchanged with "his lover/roommate," a person they describe as "a biological male who was transitioning genders." The document also includes another text in... The presumed motive has added fire to a rash of speculation by high-reach conservatives, who have suggested that this motive equated to a political ideology.

The same day Kirk was killed, President Trump claimed the shooter was a "radical leftist." Others have suggested that the suspect may have been "groomed" by a "trans terror cell" and that he was... In fact, little is still known about Robinson's politics. According to the charging document, his mother told investigators that he had become more "pro-gay and trans-rights oriented" within the last year. It also includes a text message, allegedly written by Robinson, that said "since trump got into office [my dad] has been pretty diehard maga." But Robinson is not registered with a political party in... There is no evidence of his positions on other issues of importance to the left, such as immigration or labor. September 17, 2025 By Steven Ben-Nun 9 Comments

Who Really Fired the Shot That Killed Charlie Kirk? Two Technical Clues That Demand Answers By Steven Ben-Nun / IsraeliNewsLive Updated: September 17, 2025 On the morning Charlie Kirk was fatally shot while addressing a crowd at Utah Valley University, dozens of cell phones recorded the event from multiple vantage points. From those same recordings we identified two independent, technical clues that point to important — and underreported — questions about how the attack was carried out: 1) a laser/infrared reflection visible on a security... Below we present the evidence, our analysis methods, relevant context reported by mainstream outlets, and why these findings should be part of any complete public investigation.

High-profile assassinations and attempts have rarely been one-shot affairs. Most attackers unleash multiple rounds in quick succession – whether out of panic, determination to ensure the kill, or lack of confidence in a single bullet. For example, Lee Harvey Oswald (maybe) fired three shots from the Texas School Book Depository at President John F. Kennedy in 1963. Sirhan Sirhan, who assassinated Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, emptied an eight-shot revolver at point-blank range, hitting RFK three times and wounding five bystanders.

John Hinckley Jr. likewise rapid-fired six shots in 1.7 seconds during his 1981 attempt on President Reagan. Even the recent Shinzo Abe assassination in 2022 involved two shotgun blasts – the homemade weapon’s first shot missed and the second proved fatal. By contrast, a one-shot, one-kill scenario like the Charlie Kirk shooting is highly atypical, with few modern precedents outside of military-style sniper attacks. A handful of historical assassinations do fit the “one shot, one kill” mold, but they are exceptions that prove the rule. Abraham Lincoln’s murder in 1865 was accomplished with a single pistol shot to the head at point-blank range (a very different tactical scenario).

Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination in 1968 is a closer analogy: James Earl Ray fired one rifle round from a boarding house window, striking King’s neck/jaw from roughly 200 feet away. That single .30-06 bullet was instantly mortal. Another example is the 2003 killing of Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjić, who was fatally shot by a sniper from a distant building – a professionally executed hit. These cases show that one-shot kills do occur, but they are statistically rare in the realm of political violence. Far more often, assassins fire multiple rounds or use multiple means (guns, bombs, etc.) to ensure their target is incapacitated. Historical Analysis of Shots Fired in Political Assassinations

Indeed, the norm in both historical and contemporary attacks is for attackers – especially lone-wolf extremists – to fire repeatedly until they can no longer do so (either jammed, tackled, or out of ammo). In the chaotic 1968 RFK shooting, Sirhan kept “firing his gun in random directions” until subdued. In 1981, Hinckley’s six-shot barrage wounded not just Reagan but several others. More recently, mass-shooter style assassination attempts (e.g. the 2011 shooting of Rep. Gabby Giffords or the 2023 attempted attack on Argentina’s Vice President) have involved unloading entire magazines.

Even the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally in July 2024 was a “deadly shooting” with multiple shots fired, not a single round. In that case, the sniper-positioned gunman struck a bystander fatally and grazed Mr. Trump amid several shots before fleeing. The Charlie Kirk case – a single rifle round from ~200 yards that struck the target’s neck and nothing else – is virtually unheard of in modern U.S. political violence. Such precision and restraint (one shot, then immediate exfiltration) starkly deviate from the historical pattern of high-volume gunfire in assassination scenarios.

Crucially, the one-shot kill profile is more commonly associated with trained professionals (military or paramilitary snipers, clandestine operatives, etc.) than with the typical lone extremist. Professional assassins or snipers are taught to make the first shot count – epitomized by the marksman’s adage “one shot, one kill.” By contrast, untrained attackers or emotionally charged ideologues often lack the cool... They tend to either fire multiple shots in rapid succession or continue shooting until stopped, as seen in almost all the historical examples above. Thus, Kirk’s assassination being carried out with a single, lethal round immediately invites comparisons to sniper-style tactics and raises questions about the Kirk shooter’s background and skill. Charlie Kirk is no longer here to defend himself, but physics speaks where words cannot. Geometry leaves no doubt where narratives blur.

Biology, chemistry, and neurophysiology reveal the sequence that unfolded in less than half a second. This article is not written for politics or spectacle. It is written in respect to Charlie Kirk – to preserve the truth of what the cameras captured, the math measured, and the body obeyed. Where politics blur, equations sharpen. Where words are vague, mathematics remains eternal. Figure 0.

Why the FBI’s intake doesn’t add up. The FBI pin (orange X, far-right corner) fails the math: at θ ≥ 35 – 40°, the path is too lateral, crosses the canopy edge (LOS blocked), and exposes the shooter to the audience. Wound constraints require a right→left, slight front→back track, not a posterior-left exit. The only consistent solution (green corridor: θ = 20 – 28°, φ = 5 – 7°, d = 128 – 183 m, L = 50 – 95 m, Δz = 12 – 18 m)... Any pin outside this corridor is inconsistent with physics. • Blood vents from the left side of Charlie Kirk’s neck.

On Sept. 10, 2025, Turning Point USA co-founder and conservative commentator Charlie Kirk was fatally shot during a Utah college speaking event. Politicians from all sides of the political spectrum, including U.S. President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and former President Joe Biden, condemned the shooting. Snopes is working on fact-checking claims that have spread online after Kirk's death. We fact-checked his last words, as well as famous quotes, like a comment he made about Jewish money ruining the U.S.

Here are six claims we've fact-checked about Kirk since the shooting: In the frantic hours after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, investigators discovered a gun in a wooded area near the scene in northern Utah. The federal agents seeking to trace the weapon faced a daunting task. It was a decades-old, German-made rifle built for use by the military in both World Wars, according to multiple law enforcement sources familiar with the investigation. So old that it may have been brought into the U.S. before laws were enacted in the 1960s requiring guns to be affixed with serial numbers or other marks to enable tracing.

There are believed to be millions of such weapons in homes across America. Fortunately for investigators, the alleged shooter was identified through other means — his family — who convinced him to surrender to police. But the alleged use of such a vintage weapon has raised fears among some former federal agents of the potential for other would-be assassins to seek out these powerful, accurate and hard-to-trace firearms. “Short of the security afforded to the president, there’s no way to defend against the threat posed by this,” said Scott Sweetow, a retired official with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, demands a serious and critical evaluation of the security planning, decision-making, and risk management surrounding the event. Moreover, as someone with extensive experience conducting threat risk assessments and creating security plans for large-scale engagements, I, Kurt Cooper, find myself compelled to ask questions that go beyond the immediate tragedy.

These are not questions of hindsight; they demand foresight that security consultants and planners should have exercised long before Kirk sat down to speak that day. The most pressing issues and questions are: Furthermore, from the available images and reports, Kirk was speaking in an open-air space roughly 200 yards from the Losee Center. This is a building with elevated vantage points that offered a potential shooter a direct line of sight. Placing the principal in such a vulnerable position violated fundamental protective planning principles. The presence of elevated, unsecured structures within range and in line-of-sight should have raised immediate red flags.

If the university dictated the seating, did Kirk’s security team object? If his security team did approve the seating, on what grounds?

Charlie Kirk Assassination Analysis Two Guns One Shooter Mysterylores

People Also Search

People Gather At A Makeshift Memorial For Political Activist And

The Same Day Kirk Was Killed, President Trump Claimed The

Who Really Fired The Shot That Killed Charlie Kirk? Two

High-profile Assassinations And Attempts Have Rarely Been One-shot Affairs. Most

John Hinckley Jr. Likewise Rapid-fired Six Shots In 1.7 Seconds