University of Kwazulu-Natal

American Federalism May 2025 In Review Nfcommission Gov

Bonisiwe Shabane
-
american federalism may 2025 in review nfcommission gov

What's new in the American federalism policy world? Explore the 2025 Federal and State Policy Tracker: "It's true that Republicans have often been more clearly associated with federalism. But both sides are fair-weather federalists. Both sides will, depending on the politics of the moment, prefer state or national power, depending on where they're in control. People ought to have a more enduring commitment to federalism for democratic reasons-that's the aim of my research agenda….I'm delighted to have people come late to the party.

And I hope to convince them that this shouldn't be a short-term commitment because they don't like the politics of the moment. A commitment to federalism should really be a long-term commitment based on the importance of democratic design." The Federalism Index Project at Utah Valley University's Center for Constitutional Studies exists to help educators, state leaders, and ordinary citizens better understand and appreciate the history, meaning, and contemporary relevance of American federalism... Federalism is a dynamic concept, and Federalism Law is inherently complex. But the basic principles of American federalism have not changed dramatically over time. Take a free course on the Principles of Federalism and earn Continuing Legal Education Credit.

The online course is divided into six short (10-12 minute) modules. It is taught by historians, constitutional law professors, and federalism scholars from some of the most prestigious institutions of higher education in the country. Credit can be earned in three steps: During the 2024 term, which ended on June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several decisions that affected the balance of federalism, altering how authority is shared between states and the federal government. The rulings focused less on policy outcomes and more on procedural rules, addressing disputes over the proper use of judicial remedies, the scope of federal agencies’ power, and the process by which states can...

Key rulings included: The Supreme Court’s decisions in the last term altered how federal and state powers interact and the balance of power between them. While some rulings reinforced federal supremacy, four of the five rulings directly addressed the rules governing intergovernmental relations. The decisions consistently emphasized the need for procedural clarity, encouraging both federal and state entities to be more deliberate and specific in their actions. Here’s a snapshot of the term’s key federalism-related decisions, organized by theme: Judicial remedies and state-led litigation

This category focuses on cases that directly address the power of federal courts to issue remedies. As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:415-444.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form . If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item.

If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation. Rosanne Haggerty, Ruby Bolaria Shifrin, Jacob Taylor, Kershlin Krishna, Sara Bronin, Nick Cain, Xiomara Cisneros, Adam Ruege, Henri Hammond-Paul, Jamie Rife, Josh Humphries, Beth Noveck In Spring 2022, a group of conservative extremists and political operatives met to draft a radical blueprint for government political corruption, Project 2025, designed to serve as an electoral transition policy guidance document for... The blueprint is also known as a “Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise.” It was released by the Heritage Foundation in April 2023. It is backed by 100 advisory coalition partners of far-right groups and fake political organizations funded by billionaires. Project 2025 is a 927-page policy blueprint divided into 30 chapters, each covering a department of the federal government.

The goal is to “destroy the Administrative State.” Each chapter offers detailed proposals for radically restructuring a specific federal department and assuring that political loyalists step into key positions of power on “Day One”... Project 2025 includes a 180-day playbook with specific steps for implementing proposed reforms starting with a prepared stack of Executive Orders the new president will sign upon taking power on January 20, 2025. For Project 2025 to be successful, it relies upon a scheme to hire unlimited political appointees without expiration dates to fulfill the mission of Project 2025. Known as Schedule F, this scheme also allows for the transferring of apolitical civil service employees into Schedule F where they will no longer have access to protection from corruption, political overreach, or abuse... Through Schedule F, a president and political loyalists will have full control of the Executive Branch for personal and political gain. Without civil service protections, federal employees will be powerless to stop them.

TO AVOID HATCH ACT VIOLATIONS, DO NOT CAMPAIGN FOR OR CONTACT MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ON DUTY, OR ON OFFICIAL TIME, OR USING A GOVERNMENT PHONE, OR ON GOVERNMENT PROPERTY, OR USING GOVERNMENT EQUIPMENT INCLUDING... FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE HATCH ACT, CLICK HERE. En Banc Fourth Circuit Upholds Maryland Assault Weapons Ban Under Bruen’s “Text and History” Test.

People Also Search

What's New In The American Federalism Policy World? Explore The

What's new in the American federalism policy world? Explore the 2025 Federal and State Policy Tracker: "It's true that Republicans have often been more clearly associated with federalism. But both sides are fair-weather federalists. Both sides will, depending on the politics of the moment, prefer state or national power, depending on where they're in control. People ought to have a more enduring c...

And I Hope To Convince Them That This Shouldn't Be

And I hope to convince them that this shouldn't be a short-term commitment because they don't like the politics of the moment. A commitment to federalism should really be a long-term commitment based on the importance of democratic design." The Federalism Index Project at Utah Valley University's Center for Constitutional Studies exists to help educators, state leaders, and ordinary citizens bette...

The Online Course Is Divided Into Six Short (10-12 Minute)

The online course is divided into six short (10-12 minute) modules. It is taught by historians, constitutional law professors, and federalism scholars from some of the most prestigious institutions of higher education in the country. Credit can be earned in three steps: During the 2024 term, which ended on June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several decisions that affected the balance of ...

Key Rulings Included: The Supreme Court’s Decisions In The Last

Key rulings included: The Supreme Court’s decisions in the last term altered how federal and state powers interact and the balance of power between them. While some rulings reinforced federal supremacy, four of the five rulings directly addressed the rules governing intergovernmental relations. The decisions consistently emphasized the need for procedural clarity, encouraging both federal and stat...

This Category Focuses On Cases That Directly Address The Power

This category focuses on cases that directly address the power of federal courts to issue remedies. As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:415-444.....