Ai Hallucination Why It Happens And How We Can Fix It

Bonisiwe Shabane
-
ai hallucination why it happens and how we can fix it

AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude are transforming how we work, learn, and create. But sometimes, they get things very wrong—confidently stating false facts, making up events, or even inventing entirely fake sources. This phenomenon is called AI hallucination, and it’s one of the biggest challenges in artificial intelligence today. This article is part of a series demystifying Gen AI and its applications for the world of work. You can read the earlier articles – a basic guide to LLMs, prompt engineering vs context engineering, AI bots vs agents, intro to RLHF and how Gen AI models are trained and about how... Imagine asking a friend for a restaurant recommendation, and instead of suggesting a real place, they invent one—complete with a fake menu and glowing (but imaginary) reviews.

That’s essentially what AI hallucination is: Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at sounding confident. Ask ChatGPT, Claude, or any major AI chatbot a question, and you’ll get a response that feels authoritative, well-structured, and convincing. There’s just one problem: sometimes these systems are confidently, eloquently wrong. In AI circles, this phenomenon has a name: hallucination. And in September 2025, researchers at OpenAI published findings that fundamentally changed how we understand why it happens—and revealed why fixing it might be harder than anyone expected.

The research team, led by Adam Kalai and colleagues at OpenAI, discovered something surprising: AI models don’t hallucinate because they’re broken. They hallucinate because they’re working exactly as designed. The problem lies in how AI systems are trained and evaluated. Researchers examined ten major AI benchmarks—the standardized tests used to measure how well these models perform—and found that nine of them use a binary grading system. In this system, saying “I don’t know” receives the same score as giving a completely wrong answer: zero points. This creates a perverse incentive.

If an AI has even a 10% chance of guessing correctly, it’s mathematically better to guess than to admit uncertainty. The system rewards confident bluffing over honest ignorance. In the age of intelligent machines, artificial intelligence is transforming everything—from how we write and research to how we diagnose disease, navigate cities, and interact with the digital world. These systems, trained on oceans of data, seem to possess an almost magical ability to understand language, recognize images, and solve complex problems. But lurking behind the polished facade of modern AI is a strange and sometimes unsettling phenomenon: hallucinations. No, AI doesn’t dream in the human sense.

But it can fabricate. It can make things up—confidently and convincingly. In the world of artificial intelligence, a hallucination refers to when an AI model generates information that is not true, not supported by any data, or entirely fictional. These “hallucinations” may take the form of fake facts, invented quotes, incorrect citations, or completely fabricated people, places, or events. Sometimes they’re harmless. Sometimes they’re dangerous.

Always, they raise important questions about how much we can—or should—trust intelligent machines. In this expansive exploration, we’ll journey deep into the fascinating world of AI hallucinations. What exactly are they? Why do they happen? Can they be controlled—or even eliminated? And what do they reveal about the limits of artificial intelligence and the nature of intelligence itself?

To understand AI hallucinations, we must first appreciate how modern AI works—especially large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, GPT-4, Claude, or Google Gemini. These models don’t “know” things in the way humans do. They don’t have beliefs, awareness, or access to a concrete database of verified facts. Instead, they are trained to predict the next word or token in a sentence based on statistical patterns in vast amounts of text data. An AI hallucination occurs when the model produces a response that sounds plausible but is factually incorrect, logically flawed, or completely invented. This could be something as simple as inventing a fake academic paper title or something more complex like citing a legal case that never existed.

You don't need to use generative AI for long before encountering one of its major weaknesses: hallucination. Hallucinations occur when a large language model generates false or nonsensical information. With the current state of LLM technology, it doesn't appear possible to eliminate hallucinations entirely. However, certain strategies can reduce the risk of hallucinations and minimize their effects when they do occur. To address the hallucination problem, start by understanding what causes LLMs to hallucinate, then learn practical techniques to mitigate those issues. An LLM hallucination is any output from an LLM that is false, misleading or contextually inappropriate.

Most LLMs can produce different types of hallucinations. Common examples include the following: Artificial intelligence has become part of everyday life. Tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and other large language models (LLMs) are used for everything from writing emails to researching complex topics. However, there’s one problem that still hasn’t gone away: sometimes, these AI systems confidently give answers that are just plain wrong. This is called an AI hallucination.

In this blog, we’ll break down why LLMs hallucinate and what the AI industry is doing in 2025 to reduce and fix these mistakes. An AI hallucination happens when a chatbot creates information that looks right but isn’t true. For example: Giving the wrong birthday for a famous person. Inventing a book or research paper that doesn’t exist. AI hallucination is a phenomenon where, in a large language model (LLM) often a generative AI chatbot or computer vision tool, perceives patterns or objects that are nonexistent or imperceptible to human observers, creating...

Generally, if a user makes a request of a generative AI tool, they desire an output that appropriately addresses the prompt (that is, a correct answer to a question). However, sometimes AI algorithms produce outputs that are not based on training data, are incorrectly decoded by the transformer or do not follow any identifiable pattern. In other words, it “hallucinates” the response. The term may seem paradoxical, given that hallucinations are typically associated with human or animal brains, not machines. But from a metaphorical standpoint, hallucination accurately describes these outputs, especially in the case of image and pattern recognition (where outputs can be truly surreal in appearance). AI hallucinations are similar to how humans sometimes see figures in the clouds or faces on the moon.

In the case of AI, these misinterpretations occur due to various factors, including overfitting, training data bias/inaccuracy and high model complexity. Preventing issues with generative, open-source technologies can prove challenging. Some notable examples of AI hallucination include: AI hallucinations aren’t accidents — they’re structural gaps. Discover why AI invents falsehoods and how to design contradiction-resistant, truth-verifying AI systems that forge a smarter future. Artificial Intelligence has become one of humanity’s sharpest double-edged tools.

It crafts code, answers questions, writes stories.Yet behind the polished surface, a dangerous phenomenon lurks: hallucination — AI confidently outputting falsehoods as if they were facts. Why does it happen?Is it fixable?What structural upgrades are required? We’re not here for shallow explanations.We’re here to decode reality at the blueprint level. The science of stopping AI from “making stuff up” is taking a big leap forward — here’s what it means for you. Have you ever asked an LLM a question… and it answered with something that sounded confident but turned out to be wrong? That’s what’s often called an AI hallucination: the machine didn’t just guess wrong; it invented facts.

A fascinating new research paper (soon to be published) by Leon Chlon, Ph.D. (follow him on LinkedIn here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/leochlon/) says these mistakes aren’t random at all; they happen for predictable reasons. Even better, we can already use these insights to spot them before they happen and (sometimes) prevent them entirely. Think of your AI as a student with a very small notebook. When you talk to it, it tries to summarize all the relevant facts into the tiniest, most efficient set of notes possible. Most of the time, it does a great job; it’s like a student who can ace the test just from those notes.

But sometimes, those notes leave out a tiny detail that turns out to be critical for one specific question you ask later. Top 15 Features of AI Image Generator You’ll Actually Use Top 10 Free AI Image Generator Tools: A Practical Field Test Top 10 free AI slides tools: build decks faster and smarter So… What Can AI Actually Do? The Everyday Superpowers (and Gotchas)

Why AI Tools Are Being Integrated Everywhere—And What It Means for You Since the advent of LLMs, generative AI systems have been plagued by hallucinations — their tendency to generate outputs that may sound correct but have no basis in reality. Since the launch of ChatGPT, hallucination rates seemed to steadily decrease, as models and training sets grew larger and training techniques improved. Recently, though, that trend seems to have reversed. Media coverage and industry benchmarks both confirm that recent models, including the flagship models from OpenAI (GPT-o3) and China’s DeepSeek (DeepSeek-R1) are prone to much more hallucination than their predecessors. Why is that, and what does it mean?

More on Solving the Hallucination ProblemHow Observability Can Help Solve Hallucinations in Your AI Implementation First, we must look at the various types of hallucinations: An LLM might “invent” a scientific paper and try to search for that paper.

People Also Search

AI Tools Like ChatGPT, Gemini, And Claude Are Transforming How

AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude are transforming how we work, learn, and create. But sometimes, they get things very wrong—confidently stating false facts, making up events, or even inventing entirely fake sources. This phenomenon is called AI hallucination, and it’s one of the biggest challenges in artificial intelligence today. This article is part of a series demystifying Gen AI and i...

That’s Essentially What AI Hallucination Is: Artificial Intelligence Has Become

That’s essentially what AI hallucination is: Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at sounding confident. Ask ChatGPT, Claude, or any major AI chatbot a question, and you’ll get a response that feels authoritative, well-structured, and convincing. There’s just one problem: sometimes these systems are confidently, eloquently wrong. In AI circles, this phenomenon has a name: hallucinati...

The Research Team, Led By Adam Kalai And Colleagues At

The research team, led by Adam Kalai and colleagues at OpenAI, discovered something surprising: AI models don’t hallucinate because they’re broken. They hallucinate because they’re working exactly as designed. The problem lies in how AI systems are trained and evaluated. Researchers examined ten major AI benchmarks—the standardized tests used to measure how well these models perform—and found that...

If An AI Has Even A 10% Chance Of Guessing

If an AI has even a 10% chance of guessing correctly, it’s mathematically better to guess than to admit uncertainty. The system rewards confident bluffing over honest ignorance. In the age of intelligent machines, artificial intelligence is transforming everything—from how we write and research to how we diagnose disease, navigate cities, and interact with the digital world. These systems, trained...

But It Can Fabricate. It Can Make Things Up—confidently And

But it can fabricate. It can make things up—confidently and convincingly. In the world of artificial intelligence, a hallucination refers to when an AI model generates information that is not true, not supported by any data, or entirely fictional. These “hallucinations” may take the form of fake facts, invented quotes, incorrect citations, or completely fabricated people, places, or events. Someti...